Evaluating robot manipulation policies is becoming increasingly important as generalist models, particularly vision-language-action (VLA) models, are deployed on physical robots. However, conventional real-world evaluation remains labor-intensive, unstable, and insufficiently informative. It requires repeated hardware trials, manual scene resets, and continuous operator monitoring, may produce different policy rankings across repeated evaluations, and primarily relies on success-rate metrics that provide limited information about execution quality. In contrast, humans assess robot performance by observing and comparing complete behaviors rather than relying solely on binary success outcomes. To this end, we propose R2S-Eval, an evaluation pipeline that combines real-to-sim calibration with vision-language model (VLM) preference evaluation. The real-to-sim component efficiently generates rollout videos in a simulator calibrated to the real-world evaluation setting, thereby reducing the need for repeated hardware trials. The VLM evaluator assesses the execution quality of rollout videos and produces pairwise preferences, which are subsequently aggregated into policy rankings. We further introduce a protocol to assess whether the proposed evaluation pipeline yields validated policy conclusions while mitigating the key challenges of conventional real-world evaluation. Experiments in both simulation and real-world settings demonstrate that R2S-Eval produces reliable and stable policy conclusions, achieves agreement with human preferences, substantially reduces repeated hardware-operation effort, and reveals behavior-quality differences that are not captured by binary success labels. In general, R2S-Eval advances robot evaluation from manual success counting toward automated, statistically stable, and quality-aware evaluation of robot behavior. Project page: https://r2s-eval.github.io.
Yi-Di Wang, Fei-Xiang Ruan, Ruo-Qu Chen et al.· 1 citation
Reinforcement learning (RL) is being studied for autonomous driving (AD), but its value depends on the role it plays in a task, the action interface, the evaluation protocol, and the evidence from deployment. This survey examines RL-based AD in modular and end-to-end pipelines and relates reported methods to task formulation and deployment evidence. It maps safe RL, offline RL, model-based RL, and PPO/GRPO-style fine-tuning to maneuver selection, continuous control, world modeling, and VLM/VLA-based driving. It also reviews simulators, datasets, RL platforms, and VLA benchmarks, with attention to reward design, observation space, traffic complexity, and open-loop versus closed-loop evaluation. The survey then examines deployment barriers, including safety, Sim2Real generalization, data efficiency, computation, embodied alignment, and evaluation readiness. RL and VLM/VLA-based methods have shown promise, but current evidence is insufficient to support reliable real-world deployment: many reported results come from restricted scenarios and depend on engineered rewards or simulator assumptions.
Bin Shuai, Min Hua, Le-Tian Tao et al.· Communications in Transporta...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.