Tiny Vision-Language-Action models are appealing for real-time robotic control, but reducing model scale often weakens two capabilities essential for manipulation: task-conditioned spatial grounding and coherent action generation. We introduce XS-VLA, a lightweight framework that teaches tiny VLA policies"where to look"and"how to move"without increasing deployment-time model cost. For spatial grounding, Coarse-Grained Spatial Distillation uses Qwen3-VL-4B to produce teacher-derived coarse image-plane location labels for task-relevant objects, which are quantized into a spatial vocabulary and distilled into a SmolVLM2-0.25B backbone without human annotations. For action generation, Latent Flow Matching combines a CVAE-style latent variable with flow-based policy learning to organize multimodal demonstrations during training and produce stable action chunks at deployment. On LIBERO, XS-VLA improves average success from 82.8\% to 90.3\% over SmolVLA-0.25B and improves LIBERO-Long from 63.0\% to 89.0\%. In real-world experiments, we design three tasks covering single-arm placement, precision bimanual stacking, and long-horizon sequential coordination, where XS-VLA improves average task success from 21.7\% to 65.0\%. These results show that explicit spatial grounding and latent action-structure learning can make tiny VLA models effective for robotic manipulation.
Iok Tong Lei, Ying Jie Yap, Wei Huang et al.· 0 citations
With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), research idea generation has attracted increasing attention. Existing approaches enable LLMs to retrieve relevant literature and propose novel ideas for research areas. However, current evaluation practices for idea generation remain fragmented and lack objective standards, often relying on direct LLM scoring, which limits their ability to provide unified and reliable assessments across a coherent distribution of generated ideas. To address this challenge, we propose LigBench, an automated evaluation benchmark that enables fine-grained and reliable evaluation of AI research ideas, consistently applicable across different generation distributions. In addition, we introduce PAIR-IQ, a dataset tailored for training pairwise idea judgment models and serving as an auxiliary reference to support more objective comparative evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LigBench achieves stable and interpretable evaluations, significantly improving alignment with expert judgments. Furthermore, models trained on PAIR-IQ exhibit enhanced ranking accuracy and robustness, establishing a principled standard for scalable and objective research idea assessment.
Chenrun Wang, Mingxuan Zhu, Tiancheng Huang et al.· 0 citations