Industrial health management increasingly relies on heterogeneous information sources, including condition monitoring systems, supervisory control and data acquisition systems, maintenance records, inspection results, and prognostic models. Although large language models provide new opportunities for cross-source reasoning, industrial data and analytical outputs differ substantially in structure, temporal resolution, physical meaning, and reliability. Directly integrating such heterogeneous information into a monolithic model may reduce interpretability, traceability, and adaptability to equipment and data changes. This paper introduces Industrial Tokenization, a conceptual interface for transforming source-specific analytical outputs into structured and machine-interpretable units of industrial evidence, termed Industrial Tokens. Unlike numerical tokens used to encode raw time-series data, Industrial Tokens represent domain-grounded evidence together with source, temporal scope, operating context, analytical meaning, quality or confidence information, and provenance. Based on this concept, a federated industrial architecture is proposed, where heterogeneous analytical subsystems retain autonomy while exposing standardized Industrial Tokens to a central reasoning layer. As an initial implementation, this study presents an end-to-end DiagnosisToken pathway based on vibration-diagnostic outputs, rule-based event aggregation, structured textual token generation, and LLM-based interpretation. Other Industrial Tokens, including SCADA-based condition-monitoring tokens, maintenance tokens, and prognostic tokens, are reserved as future extensions. The proposed framework positions Industrial Tokenization as a semantic interface between domain-specific industrial intelligence and LLM- or agent-based reasoning, rather than another method for encoding raw industrial data.
Ensuring measurement data quality is essential for reliable condition monitoring of industrial wind turbine drivetrains, where vibration measurements can be affected by sensor malfunctions, turbine shutdown conditions, and other non-diagnostic states. Such invalid measurements may compromise the reliability of subsequent monitoring and data-driven analysis procedures. This study proposes a Multi-Dimensional Entropy (MDE) metric as a front-end data quality assessment and control mechanism for vibration measurement validity evaluation. By characterizing signal distributions from multiple perspectives, including time-domain amplitude, spectral amplitude, and frequency-band energy, MDE captures statistical differences between valid and erroneous vibration measurements. By integrating MDE and RMS as feature representations, lightweight machine learning models are employed as evaluation tools to assess the effectiveness of the proposed representation. Experiments on a large-scale, heterogeneous real-world dataset comprising 57,643 vibration samples collected from 12 wind farms and 14 turbine units, covering multiple drivetrain components, diverse sensor brands, and varying sampling configurations over long-term operation, demonstrate that the proposed method achieves over 99 percent accuracy in identifying erroneous vibration measurements. The proposed approach can be deployed as a front-end data quality gate before downstream signal processing, feature extraction, and condition monitoring procedures, ensuring that subsequent analyses are performed using reliable vibration measurements. The results demonstrate the robustness of MDE under heterogeneous sensor configurations and highlight its potential for industrial-scale vibration measurement quality assessment.