Skip to content
← All posts

MIT Quantum Initiative launches postdoctoral fellowship program

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence · news.mit.edu · By Liam McDonnell | Office of Innovation and Strategy · August 31, 2026

The Institute welcomes its first cohort of QMIT Fellows this fall to advance interdisciplinary quantum research.

Read on MIT News · Artificial Intelligence → Opens the original article in a new tab.

More from the blog

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 20, 2026

Paving the way for greener ammonia production

New MIT research could lead to better materials for a fossil-fuel-free process for making the chemical that's essential to fertilizer and other products.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 4, 2026

Solving the solvent problem

By focusing on electrolytes, MIT scientists are making sodium-metal batteries a more practical energy storage option.

Related papers

Fermi-Dirac thermal measurements: A framework for quantum hypothesis testing and semidefinite optimization

Quantum measurements are the means by which we recover messages encoded into quantum states. They are at the forefront of quantum hypothesis testing, wherein the goal is to perform an optimal measurement for arriving at a correct conclusion. Mathematically, a measurement operator is Hermitian with eigenvalues in [0,1]. By noticing that this constraint on each eigenvalue is the same as that imposed on fermions by the Pauli exclusion principle, we interpret every eigenmode of a measurement operator as an independent effective fermionic mode. Under this perspective, various objective functions in quantum hypothesis testing can be viewed as the total expected energy associated with these fermionic occupation numbers. By instead fixing a temperature and minimizing the total expected fermionic free energy, we find that optimal measurements for these modified objective functions are Fermi-Dirac thermal measurements, wherein their eigenvalues are specified by Fermi-Dirac distributions. In the low-temperature limit, their performance closely approximates that of optimal measurements for quantum hypothesis testing, and we show that their parameters can be learned by classical or hybrid quantum-classical optimization algorithms. This leads to a new quantum machine-learning model, termed Fermi-Dirac machines, consisting of parameterized Fermi-Dirac thermal measurements-an alternative to quantum Boltzmann machines based on thermal states. Beyond hypothesis testing, we show how general semidefinite optimization problems can be solved using this approach, leading to a novel paradigm for semidefinite optimization on quantum computers, in which the goal is to implement thermal measurements rather than prepare thermal states. Finally, we propose quantum algorithms for implementing Fermi-Dirac thermal measurements, and we also propose second-order hybrid quantum-classical optimization algorithms.

Nana Liu, Mark M. Wilde · 6 citations
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2025

TabularQGAN: a quantum generative model for tabular data synthesis

A novel quantum generative model for synthesizing tabular data by proposing a quantum generative adversarial network architecture with flexible data encoding and a novel quantum circuit ansatz for effectively modeling tabular data is introduced.

P. Bhardwaj, Caitlin Jones, Lasse Dierich et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Iterative tensor network transformations for element-wise evaluation of elementary and filtering functions

Tensor networks are powerful formats for compressing large-scale data. However, their application to general data processing has been limited by the difficulty of performing nonlinear operations. Here, we introduce iterative tensor network transformations (ITNTs), a general algorithmic framework for the element-wise evaluation of elementary and nonlinear filtering functions on data encoded as tensor trains (TTs), a class of tensor networks. Our approach operates entirely in the compressed domain, enabling efficient computation on exponentially large datasets while maintaining a controlled computational cost. We demonstrate its power in two key areas: (I) evaluating highly nonlinear elementary and filtering functions on a 3D reactive flow field, enabling high-fidelity reaction rate computation and region filtering, and (II) finding extrema in complex optimization problems, such as solving Max-SAT instances on spaces up to $2^{70}$ configurations. These results establish ITNT as a foundational tool that provides tensor network methods with the capability for general-purpose data science and large-scale optimization.

Xiao Wang, Tomohiro Hashizume, Pia Siegl et al. · 2 citations
#machine learning Preprint Open access Aug 2026

An End-to-End Hybrid Quantum--Classical Sampling Workflow for Discrete Markov Random Fields: A Reproducible Case Study

Sampling from discrete Markov random fields (MRFs) is a hard problem. We study amplitude-encoded i.i.d. sampling for small MRFs where $2^n$ target probabilities are precomputed classically. This removes quantum exponential speedup but allows a clean comparison against classical MCMC based on independent circuit samples ($\tau \approx 1$). Across 60 instances spanning five graph families (1k-step burn-in, 3k retained samples), the mean ESS ratios of Quantum to Single-Site Gibbs, Block Gibbs, Tuned-Block, and Parallel Tempering are $16.35$, $7.29$, $1.82$, and $1.79$, showing modern classical samplers substantially close this gap. Amortizing $O(2^n)$ preprocessing into wall-clock time, exact inverse-CDF sampling yields $17.7\text{M}$ ESS/s versus $488\text{K}$ ESS/s for the quantum sampler ($36\times$ mean rate, $153\times$ per-instance), confirming no wall-clock advantage. We characterize MCMC autocorrelation costs and benchmark amplitude-encoded state preparation at $n \in \{8,10,12\}$. An MPS scaling study ($n \le 40$) shows bond dimension $\chi=32$ achieves $F=0.721\pm0.059$ at $n=40$. Finally, a matched-budget VQC vs. MPS comparison at $n \in \{8,10,12\}$ shows VQC fidelities fall far below MPS: $(F_{\mathrm{VQC}}, F_{\mathrm{MPS}}) = (0.31, 0.99), (0.21, 0.96), (0.17, 0.88)$ at compressions $10.7\times$, $34.1\times$, and $113.8\times$.

Arul Rhik Mazumder · 0 citations