A lightweight generative verifier for retrieval models is introduced, trained post hoc with next-token cross entropy, requires no sampled negatives or candidate pool during training, and scores only the retriever's top-$K$ candidates at inference.
Abstract
First-stage recommenders in multi-stage systems produce a ranked candidate list from which a limited prefix is forwarded to downstream rankers. Because each forwarded item must be processed by more expensive ranking stages, this shortlist cannot be arbitrarily large. The first-stage objective is therefore high coverage of relevant items within the forwarded prefix, commonly measured by Recall@$k$. A relevant item may be available deeper in the retrieved list but absent from the shorter prefix that is actually consumed. This paper studies post-hoc verification for promoting such candidates into the consumed shortlist without retraining or replacing the retriever. We introduce a lightweight generative verifier for retrieval models. Given a retriever state and a candidate item, the verifier scores the item through the likelihood of its identifier tokens. It is trained post hoc with next-token cross entropy, requires no sampled negatives or candidate pool during training, and scores only the retriever's top-$K$ candidates at inference. The interface is minimal: the retriever supplies a query state and candidate items, and the item representation can use any fixed tokenization. Across Amazon product recommendation and YaMBDa music recommendation, the same verifier training recipe improves Recall@10 for SASRec, GRU4Rec, NextItNet, and MiniOneRec. Ablations show that the improvements are not explained solely by injecting item-content features into the retriever, supporting verification as a post-hoc output-side adaptation mechanism.
Two-stage recommenders first retrieve a small candidate set from a large catalog and then apply a more detailed model to rank only those items. A common offline test instead gives every system the same candidates so that their scoring rules can be compared fairly, but this fixed-candidate protocol may select a differen...
Teresa Zhang· Proceedings of the 20th ACM...· 0 citations
VARG, a generative retrieval system for Tmall App search that directly admits generated item candidates to the existing final ranker and improves GMV, per-user IPV, and PCTR and online shopping-guide query evaluations further show that VARG maintains competitive relevance with a smaller candidate quota.
Xiao-Peng Chu, Jian-Bo Zhu, Ming-Min Jin et al.· 1 citation
Two-stage recommender systems often must choose among same-budget candidate sets before expensive reranking or online evaluation, yet Recall@K, diversity, and coverage do not measure how much fine-state-contingent choice survives retrieval. We define retained personalized headroom as the value of choosing separately fo...
Teresa Zhang· Proceedings of the 20th ACM...· 0 citations
A shared search-and-recommendation index must score new items from features alone because search has no exploration slot. In a public log covering both surfaces over one catalog, $38.6\%$ of held-out query-search impressions show an item never previously shown or visited. For user-cold engagements, the feature-based to...
Theodore Rogers, Joseph Standerfer, D. Timoshenko et al.· 0 citations
TRACE (Targeted Ranking-Aware Counterfactual Explanation), which decomposes the search into three stages under an embedding-accessible, training-free setting: influence-guided position selection, plausibility-aware candidate retrieval, and actual-margin beam pruning.
Ungsik Kim, Sang-Min Choi, Gun-Woo Kim et al.· Proceedings of the 20th ACM...· 1 citation
The Recall-Aware Evaluation Protocol (RAEP) is proposed: first classify the retrieval-recall regime, then evaluate reranking where the ceiling permits meaningful differentiation; in the low-recall regimes measured here, improving retrieval is more consequential than increasing reranker sophistication.