Skip to content

PEARL: Structural Privacy-Utility Control in Human-Centric CPS via Personalized Early-Exit Deep Reinforcement Learning

Mar 2024 · 2 citations · 46 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

PEARL (Personalized Early-exit Adaptive Reinforcement Learning) reduces adversarial state-inference accuracy by 25.67% on average with a controlled 10-16% utility cost, establishing a practical, dynamically enforceable privacy-utility tradeoff.

Abstract

In human-centric Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), personalized Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents must share fine-grained control actions with cloud services, exposing sensitive private states to inference attacks by honest-but-curious adversaries. Static privacy models fail to address the dynamic nature of human interactions. This paper introduces PEARL (Personalized Early-exit Adaptive Reinforcement Learning), a novel framework that addresses this challenge through structural privacy control rather than data perturbation. PEARL deploys a dual-path Early-Exit Deep Q-Network (EE-DQN) at the edge, using Mutual Information (MI) between private states and observable actions to train per-branch binary labels: Utility Confidence Labels (UCL), verifying action quality, and Privacy Confidence Labels (PCL), verifying MI leakage remains below a user-defined threshold. At inference, PEARL selects the shallowest exit branch satisfying both UCL and PCL, structurally limiting shared action descriptive power without noise injection. An MI-based feedback loop tracks behavioral drift and triggers retraining when privacy-utility profiles shift, ensuring long-term robustness. Validated on a personalized smart-home HVAC system and a VR smart classroom, PEARL reduces adversarial state-inference accuracy by 25.67% on average with a controlled 10-16% utility cost, establishing a practical, dynamically enforceable privacy-utility tradeoff.

View source

Similar papers

2026

PI-SAFE: Practical Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference With Adversarial Fine-Tuning for Optimized Utility

Cloud-based Large Language Model (LLM) inference services typically require users to submit plain-text inputs, thereby posing severe privacy risks. Existing privacy-preserving paradigms are mostly task-specific and often necessitate pervasive modifications to the entire server-side model. This reliance introduces subst...

Wentao Zhong, Yu-Ting Li, Di-Cong Yu et al. · 0 citations
2026

Action-Level Backdoor Attacks Against Deep Reinforcement Learning Systems via Adaptive Reward Exploration

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has demonstrated remarkable capabilities in domains such as robotics, finance, and autonomous systems. With the increasing cost of training, DRL models are increasingly shared and reused via model marketplaces, cloud platforms, and open-source repositories. This trend exposes DRL syste...

Ou-Bo Ma, L. Du, Yang Dai et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Privacy-Preserving Prompted Policy Search for Robotic Control

The proposed PP-ProPS outperforms ProPS in seven of the ten evaluated tasks, and surpasses conventional RL methods including PPO, SAC, and TRPO, in five of the six tasks.

Ali Irshayyid, Feng Lin, Chong Li et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

PROACT-Agent: Progressive Runtime Oversight and Active Circuit-breaking for Real-Time Safety

The transition from Large Language Models (LLMs) to agents shifts safety stakes from toxic text to irreversible environmental harm. While current defenses remain largely retrospective, proactive runtime intervention is bottlenecked by the lack of large-scale, causally-consistent data. We propose PROACT-Agent, a framewo...

Ding Jia, Wei Liu, Xiang-Long Du et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Follow the Winners: Conservative Policy Improvement with the Cross-Entropy Method for Critic-Free RFT

Critic-free reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) for agentic large language models is often done through GRPO-style methods, which compute a group baseline over repeated rollouts to reduce target variance. However, this setup is ill-suited to agents acting in stateful environments such as live services or security sandboxes...

Joery A. de Vries, Neil D. Lawrence, Zhen-Wen Dai · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

CAAP: Context-Adaptive Adversarial Policy Learning Under Partial Observability

Adversarial policies provide a practical means of stress-testing reinforcement-learning agents by inducing failure through environment interactions without modifying the deployed victim policy. Learning effective adversarial policies under partial observability is challenging because the attacker must act from incomple...

Guang-Yu Pan, Bo Hou, Yao Chen et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Nov 3, 2026

Learn the rules: The hacker mindset

Research Manager Mike Walker reflects on a career spanning hacker culture, cybersecurity, and AI, sharing lessons about trust, teamwork, leadership, and why solving difficult problems requires curiosity, judgment, agility—and an understanding of the rules. The post Learn the rules: The hacker mindset appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.