Sep 2026· AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology· pp. ajnr.A9630· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
T1 postcontrast MRI radiomics showed limited standalone discrimination for overall survival in patients with brain metastases, which support cautious use of radiomics as an exploratory imaging biomarker and emphasize the need for integrated prognostic models that include clinical, treatment, molecular, and systemic disease variables.
Abstract
Background
Brain metastases carry poor prognosis, and accurate survival prediction is critical for treatment planning. Radiomics offers a means of extracting high-dimensional imaging biomarkers, but its prognostic utility in brain metastasis remains unclear.
Purpose
To evaluate whether MRI-derived radiomic features can improve survival prediction in patients with brain metastases.
Materials And Methods
This retrospective study developed a T1 postcontrast MRI radiomics survival model in a public brain metastasis cohort of 198 patients and externally validated the fixed radiomics model, without refitting or recalibration, in an independent cohort of 69 patients. Patient-level radiomics features were derived from lesion-level features aggregated across the three largest lesions. An elastic-net Cox model was selected with 10-fold cross-validation. Model discrimination was assessed with Harrell C-index and 2000 bootstrap resamples for 95% CIs.
Results
The final model retained 7 nonzero T1 postcontrast radiomics features after correlation filtering and elastic-net selection. The radiomics score had a C-index of 0.615 (95% CI, 0.543-0.687) in the training cohort and 0.574 (95% CI, 0.491-0.658) in external validation. In the external-validation subset with available Graded Prognostic Assessment, the combined radiomics plus Graded Prognostic Assessment model had a C-index of 0.591 (95% CI, 0.509-0.672).
Conclusion
T1 postcontrast MRI radiomics showed limited standalone discrimination for overall survival in patients with brain metastases. These results support cautious use of radiomics as an exploratory imaging biomarker and emphasize the need for integrated prognostic models that include clinical, treatment, molecular, and systemic disease variables.
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the prognostic role of growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) brain metastases and develop a non-invasive radiogenomic model combining MRI radiomics with transcriptomics for GAP43 prediction and survival estimation.
METHODS
This retrospective study included 308 patie...
Chen Sun, Yuqi Liu, Chenggang Jiang et al.· European Journal of Radiolog...· 0 citations
To develop and validate a preoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI)-based radiomics model for noninvasive prediction of interleukin-13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13Rα2) expression and prognostic stratification in glioblastoma (GBM).
A total of 422 patients with 2016 WHO grade IV GBM from The Ca...
Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children, with risk stratification guiding therapy and prognosis. Although current risk stratification incorporates imaging-based staging, definitive risk assignment still relies on tissue and molecular characterization, highlighting the need for complementar...
M. Anders, F. Mollica, T. Meyer et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
Introduction Reliable differentiation between malignant and benign prostate lesions remains a critical challenge in clinical practice, particularly in settings with limited access to expert interpretation of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). We investigated whether a streamlined radiomics framework based solely on apparent...
Kun Zhang, Jia-Jun Zhang, Yangguang Yuan et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
In this multicenter study, which included external validation, clinical variables provided most of the predictive value for postoperative residual meningioma, whereas radiomic features provided only limited incremental value when added to the clinical model.
Nafiye Şanlıer, Murat Yuce, Umid Sulaimanov et al.· Neurosurgical Focus· 0 citations
By identifying low-risk patients within the NCCN high-risk group and high-risk patients within the NCCN low + intermediate-risk group for recurrence, these models may support treatment de-escalation and escalation, respectively, pending prospective multicenter validation.
N. Chakrabarty, S. Rane, U. Sherkhane et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.