SOCIALLY EMBEDDED HUMAN-CENTERED AI: THE HUMAN FILTER AS ETHICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR AI-MEDIATED DECISIONS UNDER PRESSURE, HIERARCHY AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINT
Jul 2026· International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics· Vol 15, pp. 47-65· 0 citations· 22 references
TL;DR
This paper introduces Socially Embedded Human-Centered AI as an extension of the Human Filter, the ethical mechanism through which humans interpret, question and evaluate AI outputs before they become consequential decisions.
Abstract
Human-centered artificial intelligence is usually framed as a design intention: build AI that respects human agency, oversight and wellbeing. This paper argues that intention is not sufficient. AI systems are always deployed inside social conditions — professional hierarchies, institutional rules, time pressure, bias and conflicting stakeholder expectations — that shape whether human oversight is actually exercised. We introduce Socially Embedded Human-Centered AI as an extension of the Human Filter, the ethical mechanism through which humans interpret, question and evaluate AI outputs before they become consequential decisions. We map the three Human Filter functions — ethical sensitivity, value alignment and reflective elevation — against five embeddedness conditions, illustrate the framework across healthcare, law and business, and derive design implications for trustworthy, human-centered AI systems that remain accountable under real social pressure.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping workplace learning, yet HRD lacks an integrated explanation of how AI redistributes developmental authority, feedback legitimacy, and trainer accountability. This paper advances the Human–AI Synergy Framework for HRD, an integrative role-and-governance model linking role clarity, sh...
Vishal Arghode, F. Nafukho· Human Resource Development R...· 0 citations
The study proposes the Sociotechnical Explainability Alignment (SEA) framework, which conceptualizes ethical XAI as requiring alignment across four levels: design, user, team, and organization.
Hoda Parvaneh Shirazi, A. Al-Asfour, Sami El Ahmadie et al.· Systems· 0 citations
A Multi-Layer Social-Theoretical AI Ethics Framework (MLST-AEF) that integrates normative ethical reasoning, stakeholder analysis, institutional context, bias and power assessment, and structured decision support is developed.
M. Fakrudeen, J. Otieno· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
The construct of calculated inefficiency is developed, defined as the structural property of a hybrid information system in which human interventions in automatable processes are maintained at levels above what pure efficiency optimisation would select, regardless of whether that maintenance was deliberately architecte...
Mohamed El Louadi, Maher Kallel· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
This paper explores the idea of promoting well-being and safety in human-AI interactions by forcing AI agents explicitly to empower humans and to manage the power balance between humans and AI agents in a desirable way. Using a principled, partially axiomatic approach based on desirable properties, we design a parametr...