Skip to content

Adaptive Human-AI Collaboration: A Review of Multimodal Context Modeling, Uncertainty-Aware Intervention, and Longitudinal Co-Adaptation

Jul 2026 · Companion Publication of the 28th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction · 1 citation · 72 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A review of adaptive human-AI collaboration literature through a closed-loop lens and integrates three taxonomies into MCAL, a dual-timescale Multimodal Co-Adaptation Loop reference model.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a static decision-support tool to an adaptive collaborator that must sense context, decide when and how to intervene, and improve through repeated interaction with humans individually and in groups. Yet meta-analytic evidence shows that human-AI combinations often fail to outperform the best of either partner alone, and the enabling literature remains fragmented across multimodal sensing, uncertainty quantification, reliance and delegation, facilitation, and teaming. This paper reports a review of adaptive human-AI collaboration literature through a closed-loop lens. Following iterative identification, staged selection against explicit criteria, structured extraction, taxonomy-driven synthesis, and snowballing, we analyze 50 reviewed works. We contribute i) a taxonomy of multimodal context modeling, from individual states to collective states such as group engagement and participation equality; ii) a taxonomy of uncertainty-aware intervention, covering uncertainty sources, estimation and calibration mechanisms, an intervention repertoire that ranges from explanation modulation and deferral to group facilitation, and intervention policies; and iii) a taxonomy of longitudinal co-adaptation and synergy-oriented evaluation. We integrate the three taxonomies into MCAL, a dual-timescale Multimodal Co-Adaptation Loop reference model, and instantiate it on a mixed human-robot workspace, walking every stage of the loop through one concrete setting to show what each taxonomy cell holds in practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.