Jul 2026· Electronics· Vol 15, pp. 2887· 0 citations
TL;DR
Results indicate that ADD offers an effective strategy for building secure and lightweight deep learning models for radar jamming recognition, and synergistically integrates adversarial training with knowledge distillation to produce lightweight yet robust jamming recognition models.
Abstract
Deep learning models have achieved remarkable performance in radar jamming recognition, yet they remain highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks—small, carefully crafted perturbations that cause misclassification—posing a critical threat to intelligent electronic countermeasure systems. Existing adversarial defenses suffer from an inherent accuracy–robustness tradeoff, limited defensive knowledge sources, and poor generalization to unseen attacks, while the additional challenge of model lightweighting for resource-constrained radar platforms remains largely unaddressed. This paper proposes Adversarial Distillation Defense (ADD), a training framework that synergistically integrates adversarial training with knowledge distillation to produce lightweight yet robust jamming recognition models. In ADD, an adversarially pre-trained teacher model simultaneously transfers its classification knowledge on clean samples and defensive knowledge on adversarial samples to a compact student model through four complementary loss terms. Extensive experiments on a simulated dataset comprising seven radar jamming types demonstrate that ADD achieves the strongest defensive performance among the compared defenses under both white-box and black-box attacks across varying perturbation strengths and jamming-to-noise ratios. Feature-space visualization further confirms that ADD enables the student model to maintain well-separated class clusters even under strong adversarial perturbations. These results indicate that ADD offers an effective strategy for building secure and lightweight deep learning models for radar jamming recognition.
This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhan...
Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar· Journal of Computer Virology...· 0 citations
This paper advocates for a forward-thinking approach that balances technical sophistication with human-centric principles, ensuring that adversarial deep learning evolves into a discipline not just of technical defense, but also of trust, transparency, and accountability.
Maisam Abbas, Ran-Zan Wang· IEEE Open Journal of the Com...· 0 citations
Experiments on ImageNet across multiple ViT architectures and attacks show that decoys can redirect high attention scores away from the true adversarial region while preserving much of the attack effectiveness, revealing a fundamental limitation of using attention magnitude as an indicator of adversarial relevance.
Giulia Marchiori Pietrosanti, Giulio Rossolini, Giorgio C. Buttazzo· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Machine learning models are increasingly adapted in various domains. However, adversarial examples pose a significant threat to the reliable deployment of these models. In recent years, some powerful adversarial example attacks have been proposed for the fast and query-efficient generation of adversarial examples, even...
Hamid Dashtbani, Mehdi Dousti Gandomani, A. M. Sadeghzadeh· Trans. Mach. Learn. Res.· 0 citations
This study set up a baseline image classifier for images of digits and attacked the images using the fast gradient sign method, and hypothesized that introducing adversarial training for this classifier would significantly improve downstream classification accuracy in all three algorithmic defense settings.
Braden Yian, Clayton Greenberg· Journal of emerging investig...· 0 citations
The study systematically compares two distinct adversarial training strategies: ‘pre-train’, where adversarial examples are generated beforehand, and ‘in-train’, where perturbations are introduced dynamically during the training process, to understand the advantages and limitations of each approach in enhancing model r...
José María Jorquera Valero, Ibon Bengoechea Cazorla, Manuel Gil Pérez· IEEE Access· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.