PatchRisk is constructed, a leakage-aware benchmark from Open Source Vulnerability advisories and deps.dev dependency graphs for npm and PyPI that improves AUPRC over the strongest TimeOnly baseline and remains stable across smaller scales and package-group shuffle robustness tests.
Abstract
Open-source software ecosystems are web-scale dependency networks. A downstream package can become exposed to security risk not because its own source code changes, but because one of its transitive dependencies later receives a vulnerability advisory. Existing vulnerability-detection work often focuses on whether code is currently vulnerable or whether a known vulnerable dependency is already present. We study a different problem: future transitive vulnerability exposure. Given a package-version dependency graph observed at release time, the task is to predict whether any non-root dependency will receive a vulnerability advisory within a future horizon. This problem is important for Web intelligence and software supply-chain security because it supports proactive dependency triage before future exposure is visible. It is also easy to evaluate incorrectly: current vulnerable dependencies can leak the label, and different versions of the same root package can create package-level memorization across train and test splits. We therefore construct PatchRisk, a leakage-aware benchmark from Open Source Vulnerability advisories and deps.dev dependency graphs for npm and PyPI. The benchmark uses filtration-aware labels, package-disjoint evaluation, temporal testing, and nested 1K, 3K, 5K, and 10K sampling scales. The largest cleaned setting contains 9,007 root package-version graphs spanning 4,157 root packages. We evaluate three feature families: TimeOnly, GraphStruct, and HistoryGraph. On the 10K temporal-test benchmark, HistoryGraph improves AUPRC over the strongest TimeOnly baseline from 0.351 to 0.640 for 90-day forecasting and from 0.473 to 0.813 for 365-day forecasting. The improvement remains stable across smaller scales and package-group shuffle robustness tests.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.
O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· IET Software· 238 citations· ⚡9
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 2, 2026
Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.
Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…
AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.