Findings confirm that SHAP significantly enhances model transparency and generates economically meaningful insights beyond classical regression, supporting its application in auditable, regulatory compliant financial modeling.
Abstract
The increasing adoption of machine learning models in corporate valuation has substantially improved predictive accuracy but at the cost of interpretability, a critical limitation in regulated financial environments. This study investigates whether SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) can systematically enhance the transparency of XGBoost based valuation models and examines whether the resulting insights extend those of classical linear regression. An empirical analysis was conducted on a cross-sectional dataset of U.S. publicly listed firms (2018), including more than 200 financial indicators. After systematic preprocessing and a hybrid feature selection procedure combining XGBoost importance, mutual information, and correlation based filtering, both an OLS regression and an XGBoost model were trained and validated. XGBoost achieved substantially higher predictive performance (R2 = 0.654 vs. 0.364), while SHAP values provided transparent global and local explanations of model decisions. Both models consistently identified earnings before tax and EV to sales as primary value drivers; however, SHAP additionally showed nonlinear effects, threshold behaviors, and context dependent interactions, particularly for EBITDA margin, share buybacks, and asset based indicators, that remain undetectable in linear models. These findings confirm that SHAP significantly enhances model transparency and generates economically meaningful insights beyond classical regression, supporting its application in auditable, regulatory compliant financial modeling.
It can be concluded that precise targeting policies can be achieved by measuring interaction effects and that regulatory bodies will consider book-building processes for large IPOs when there is a signal of demand.
Ali Albada, Rabie A. Ramadan, E. Abusham et al.· Discover Artificial Intellig...· 0 citations
This study examines whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance improves risk-adjusted stock returns and identifies the information-transmission channels underlying this relationship. Using an unbalanced panel of 1,104 Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2019 and Bloomberg ESG scores, the anal...
Cheng Qian· World Journal of Economics a...· 0 citations
The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping corporate reporting and sustainability practices, yet empirical evidence on how AI adoption improves environmental, social, and governance disclosure quality remains limited. This study investigates the effect of artificial intelligence adoption (AIA) o...
Desmond Bayong, De-Jun Zhou, A. Agyemang· Business Strategy and the En...· 0 citations
Improving green innovation efficiency has become a central concern for firms pursuing sustainable development in the digital economy. Although artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly incorporated into corporate strategies, existing studies have primarily relied on conventional linear econometric approaches to exam...
Analysis reveals that the improvement in accounting information quality associated with AI is stronger for firms located in regions with higher levels of marketization and more developed digital infrastructure, as well as for firms facing less intense market competition.
Jun-Min Yang, Ze-Lei Lin, Li He et al.· Journal of Risk and Financia...· 1 citation
Using dataset of Chinese A‐share listed companies from 2010 to 2022, a nonlinear prediction framework is developed and machine learning models significantly outperform traditional linear approaches, with Random Forest delivering the best performance.
Bo Liu, Mu-Zi Zhu, Ya-Hao Zhang et al.· Journal of Forecasting· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 30, 2026
MIT professors Adam Berinsky and Chara Podimata discuss a new project to track how AI chatbots are responding to questions about the 2026 U.S. midterm elections.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 30, 2026
Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.
Critical flaws, compromised release channels and agentic AI threats landed within days of each other in mid-October 2026. Why “Black October” may say more about how well we now find weaknesses than about the attacks themselves. The post Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation appeared first on GPT-Lab.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.