At least 48-hours of aEEG was highest yield for seizures, and longer studies may be appropriate for people with lower seizure frequency; IEDs were less dependent on study length and were more associated with pre-aEEG certainty of epilepsy diagnosis.
Abstract
Background
Ambulatory EEG (aEEG) can be high yield, accessible, and cost-effective for prolonged outpatient monitoring, but it is unclear how patient and clinical characteristics can be used to select patients for whom aEEG may be diagnostic. To this end, this study aims to identify factors associated with diagnostic yield for interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and seizures.
Methods
We evaluated all ambulatory EEGs from a Comprehensive Epilepsy Center over a 6-month period performed on adults. Using logistic regression and recursive feature elimination (RFE), we evaluated how patient and clinical characteristics were associated with observing IEDs or seizures.
Results
AEEG was performed for 179 patients (average age 45, 58% female). The median aEEG duration was 48 h (range 18.5 to 86 h). Diagnostic yield was 35% for IEDs and 10% for seizures. IED observation was more likely when a prior aEEG was abnormal (Odds Ratio [OR] 3.37, p = 0.039) or with more concurrent antiseizure medications (OR 1.45/medication, p = 0.007). Seizure observation was more likely on 72-hour studies (OR 26, p = 0.003) predominantly within the first 48 h, with higher seizure frequency (OR 1.71 per log seizure/month, p = 0.034), and with IEDs observed in prior epilepsy monitoring unit admission (OR 22, p = 0.004).
Conclusions
This study identified factors associated with diagnostic yield of aEEG for observing IEDs and seizures. At least 48-hours of aEEG was highest yield for seizures, and longer studies may be appropriate for people with lower seizure frequency. IEDs were less dependent on study length and were more associated with pre-aEEG certainty of epilepsy diagnosis.
Evaluated seizure-detection rate with aEEG in an underserved epilepsy population and how it relates to self-reported seizure control is examined to highlight the importance of objective monitoring beyond patient self-report, particularly in vulnerable populations.
Julia Bodnya, J. Soble, G. Trifan et al.· Epilepsia· 0 citations
BackgroundTo evaluate the use, diagnostic yield, and timing of EEG in emergency department (ED) patients receiving second-line intravenous antiseizure medication (IV ASM).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients aged ≥16 years who received IV ASM at Tampere University Hospital over one year. Episodes were categorize...
Teemu Pöytäkangas, P. Basnyat, J. Saarinen et al.· Clinical EEG and Neuroscienc...· 0 citations
Early identification of epileptiform activity in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a clinical challenge, with important implications for prognosis and treatment. The primary objective of this prospective single-center study was to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of 1 h EEG (1hEEG) and contin...
Rafael Pires de Sá Valeriano, Thiago Z. Lima, M. Foresti et al.· Experimental Neurology· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are a key diagnostic finding in first seizure, early epilepsy, and acute brain dysfunction. Variability in visual electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis contributes to diagnostic uncertainty. We performed a systematic review of the reproducibility of IED detection in...
J. Brøgger, Eivind Aanestad, S. Beniczky et al.· Epilepsia· 0 citations
Overall, the presence of SCSs alone was not associated with a poor outcome, but the spatial non-concordance with the seizure-onset zone was highly predictive for poor seizure outcome.
P. Bosque-Varela, Panagiota-Eleni Tsalouchidou, Petra Levicka et al.· Epilepsia· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.