Mental health disorders impose a substantial global burden, while access to care remains constrained. AI-based chatbots have emerged as scalable digital interventions, yet existing evidence is limited by heterogeneous intervention types and methodological shortcomings. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of AI-based chatbot interventions on mental health using a three-level meta-analytic approach. A systematic review was conducted across seven databases, yielding 16 eligible studies and 67 effect sizes. A three-level random-effects meta-analysis was performed to account for dependency among multiple outcomes within studies. AI-based chatbot interventions were associated with a statistically significant small-to-moderate improvement in mental health outcomes (Hedges' g = 0.47, 95% CI [0.18, 0.77]). Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses indicated that the pooled effect estimate remained stable. No significant moderators were identified, although significant improvements were observed across depression, anxiety, loneliness, affect, and sleep. Most studies presented some risk of bias, and overall evidence certainty was low. Overall, AI-based chatbot interventions were associated with modest improvements across multiple mental health domains. These findings should be interpreted as reflecting the effects of the interventions as integrated packages rather than the isolated therapeutic contribution of AI technology.
Mental health-focused chatbots have emerged as scalable interventions that deliver therapeutic content through conversational interfaces. This meta-analysis of 35 studies (N = 1,780) indicates that chatbots can reduce depression (g = -.53, 95% CI [-.67,-.40]) and anxiety (g = -.36, 95% CI [-.46,-.27]) symptoms over tim...
Camille J. Saucier, Huaye Li, Christopher Calabrese et al.· Health Communication· 0 citations
To evaluate the effects of AI-mediated conversational interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms in university students, while distinguishing outcome domains, comparator intensity, intervention architecture, and the evidential requirements for standardized post-intervention effect estimation, the search date was...
Chen Shao, Xiao-Chen Chen, Sheng-Nan Qiao et al.· Frontiers in Psychiatry· 0 citations
To evaluate the effectiveness of AI-powered chatbots on self-directed learning (SDL; primary outcome), satisfaction, confidence, and critical thinking in health professions students.
We systematically searched five databases Library up to July 2026. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data...
Amir Torab-Miandoab, M. Ghafourifard, Sogand Habibi-chenaran et al.· Journal of Medical Education...· 0 citations
Overall, AI CBT chatbots appear most defensible as accessible self-help or adjunctive tools rather than replacements for therapist-led CBT, and carefully supervised human-AI models of care.
Qing-Yang She· Lecture Notes in Education P...· 0 citations
Background: Mental disorders represent a major global public health challenge. Mental health care is affected by limited access to services, shortages of mental health professionals, stigma, and growing healthcare costs. In response to these challenges, artificial intelligence-based technologies, including chatbots and...
Monika Łapot, Krzysztof Hober, Dominika Krupnik et al.· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
This systematic review synthesised evidence on the applications, effectiveness, engagement, acceptability, and responsible design of large language model (LLM)- and AI-based conversational agents for mental health and psychological well-being. Following the PRISMA 2020 framework, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect were...