Skip to content
Review Open access

Development and evaluation of a risk-based air quality index for Germany.

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · Vol 277, pp. 114867 · 0 citations · 47 references
Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

We developed and evaluated a risk-based Air Quality Index (AQI) for Germany that harmonizes pollutant categories on risk equivalence, incorporates hourly concentrations, and improves health-relevant communication.

Methods

We identified pollutant-outcome pairs with causal or likely causal evidence, extracted effect estimates from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and transformed daily mean effects into hourly effect estimates using German monitoring data. Equivalence coefficients were derived via Monte Carlo simulations and standardized to PM2.5 as the reference pollutant. PM2.5 thresholds were anchored in WHO Air Quality Guideline 2021 and the EU information threshold; risk-equivalent thresholds for PM10, NO2, O3, and SO2 were generated accordingly. An additional module was developed to account for concurrent elevation of multiple pollutants. The index was empirically evaluated using hourly data from German monitoring stations for 2019 and 2022, and the results were compared with the previous AQI. In sensitivity analyses, we assessed the effects of incorporating updated evidence and excluding asthma-related outcomes.

Results

Application of the risk-based AQI resulted in a marked shift from "very good" to "good" and "moderate" categories in comparison with the previous AQI, particularly for PM2.5 and O3, reflecting stricter concentration thresholds. "Poor" classifications increased modestly, while "very poor" remained rare. The multipollutant episodes module affected less than 1% of hours.

Conclusion

Overall, the risk-based AQI represents a significant step toward health-based communication of air quality in Germany. By integrating scientific evidence into its design and providing tailored guidance, it enhances preventive public health protection. Its implementation may improve risk awareness and support behavioural changes that reduce exposure.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Does Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) Forecasting Improve Population Health? Evidence from Hong Kong, China

The implementation of the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) is a regional climate action intended to protect population health, but its empirical linkage to the sustainability goal of good health and well-being remains untested. Using mortality data from Hong Kong (2013–2022), we employed a two-month-lag fixed-effects mo...

Yiling Chen, Bi-Bo Yin · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Short-term health impacts of air pollution in Canada: a nonlinear multi-pollutant Bayesian case-crossover framework

Abstract Background Most short-term air pollution studies rely on linear, single-pollutant models that cannot adequately describe the nonlinear and interdependent nature of pollutant-health associations. Methods We developed a nonlinear multi-pollutant Bayesian case-crossover model to jointly evaluate short-term health...

Guo-Wen Huang, Patrick E. Brown, H. Shin · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Development and two-city validation of a Temperature-Sensitive Air Quality Health Index incorporating synergistic effects of air pollution and thermal stress

Background Ambient air pollution and non-optimal temperatures are two major environmental risk factors that interact to amplify health risks. Current Air Quality Health Indices (AQHI) are vital public health tools for warning against air pollution risk, but fail to account for the synergistic health effects of air poll...

Chu-Chu Luo, Hao-Xian He, Yi-Ting Li et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Advancing Long-Term Outdoor Air Pollution Exposure Assessment for Health Studies: Lessons from a Multinational Research Initiative

The Health Effects Institute recently completed an extensive research initiative to investigate novel approaches to improve assessment of long-term exposure to outdoor air pollution for health studies in North America and Europe. This overview synthesizes the key results, strengths, and limitations, along with other ke...

H. Boogaard, Dan L. Crouse, A. Patton et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.