This paper presents a new dataset that consists of the citation graph of court opinions, which cite previously published court opinions in support of their arguments, and focuses on the verbatim quotes, i.e., where the text of the original opinion is directly reused.
Citing legal opinions is a key part of legal argumentation, an expert task that requires retrieval, extraction and summarization of information from court decisions. The identification of legally salient parts in an opinion for the purpose of citation may be seen as a domain-specific formulation of a highlight extracti...
Unknown authors· International Conference on...· 3 citations
Legal decisions on asylum applications consist of long, complex, and heterogeneous documents, covering narrative applicant interviews, original decisions, and additional supporting materials. If an application is rejected, a critical question in processing an appeal is whether the credibility of the information in the...
M. Vlachou, Anna Murphy Høgenhaug, Mohammad N. S. Jahromi et al.· 0 citations
Access to legal information remains a significant challenge in low-resource jurisdictions, where judicial documents are often lengthy, unstructured, and difficult to interpret. This paper presents a unified framework for automated argument mining and named entity recognition in Sri Lankan legal judgments using Large La...
ReSB2 is introduced, a framework for retrieving and linking similar legislative bills that supports human–machine collaboration and helps reduce redundancy in the lawmaking process, and fine-tunes two ModernBERT-based language models on authentic legislative data.
Lucas G. L. Costa, Átila Souza, Elves Rodrigues et al.· Proceedings of the 37th ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
