Skip to content
Open access

Balancing the scales of privacy: Perceptions of privacy issues and digital risk among domestic internet of things users

Sep 2026 · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · 0 citations · 76 references

TL;DR

The “Scales of Privacy" model provides a holistic view of the process underlying the privacy calculus framework, incorporating both perceived risks and perceived benefits of data disclosure and including neutralizing factors, such as privacy cynicism and “nothing to hide” arguments.

Abstract

While the proliferation of smart home technologies and the domestic Internet of Things (IoT) bring opportunities for a high level of control over household appliances and entertainment systems, it also presents challenges, not least in terms of privacy. In this study, we explore domestic IoT users’ perceptions of privacy issues and digital risk through in-depth semistructured interviews and digital home visits with 12 adults in 10 households in Norway. Based on the results of this study, we present a framework for an updated understanding of current privacy protection behaviors and decision-making from the perspective of domestic IoT users. Our “Scales of Privacy" model provides a holistic view of the process underlying the privacy calculus framework, incorporating both perceived risks and perceived benefits of data disclosure and including neutralizing factors, such as privacy cynicism and “nothing to hide” arguments. The results show a variety of perceived sources of risk, including national entities, technology companies, hackers, and partners/family. However, we highlight a discrepancy between the understanding of risk and perceived risk of our informants, on the one hand, and their actual behavior, on the other. We examine users’ stated reasons for utilizing an IoT-connected technology despite the risk, identifying five underlying motivations. Two were intrinsically related to the frictionless user experience provided by the devices (i.e., convenience and ease of use), whereas the remaining three (i.e., inevitability, unimpeachability and indiscernibility) revealed attitudes toward privacy protection partially influenced by a sense of being overwhelmed by the friction-filled experience of setting boundaries around personal data in the current digital environment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Context, Not Paradox: How Do Users Protect Their Privacy in the Digital World?

The article focuses on the importance of context in the decision-making process regarding privacy on the Internet. Previous analyses have primarily been based on the concepts of the privacy paradox, privacy cynicism, and privacy self-management, which explain in different ways the tension between individuals declared a...

Julia Heller · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Consumer Privacy, Ethics and Autonomy in a Digital Society

As enterprises continuously rely on data to effectively drive and power business processes in a digital economy, privacy concerns have emerged as a major source of deep concern among consumers and privacy advocates in a digital society. Several scholars have shared their opinions and perspectives in related articles on...

Evans Achara · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Privacy and Human Rights in the Digital Age: Challenges of a Technology- Centric Society

Digital technologies impact communication across education, healthcare, employment and administration. In addition to increasing communication through technology, the technologies also increased the collection storage and processing of personal data. This paper provides a review of privacy and human rights as they rela...

Shivika Jain, Jageshwar Nath Singh · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Enhancing Privacy, Neglecting Harms: An Analysis of Real-World Digital Privacy Incidents

Privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) have emerged as a technical means for providing individuals with greater control over their information. Yet despite the growing deployment of PETs, people continue to experience privacy harms. In this work, we revisit our understanding of privacy incidents and the realities of tho...

Shannon Veitch, C. Shem, L. Csomor et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Disentangling the paradox of the privacy paradox on social media: The role of privacy dimensions, perceived benefits, privacy self-efficacy, and privacy cynicism

Perceived benefits, privacy self-efficacy, and privacy cynicism are tested as moderating factors for the privacy paradox on both horizontal and vertical dimensions of privacy on social media.

Laurent H. Wang, T. Dienlin, Miriam J. Metzger · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Dark Patterns, Perceived Control, and Privacy Disclosure Intention in E-Wallet Applications: A Privacy Calculus Perspective

As E-Wallet use becomes more popular among Indonesians daily users, an issue has risen alongside it. The issue is how much personal data users would be willing to share, and whether they fully understand the usage of their personal data. Interface design plays a big part in steering users to share more than they intend...

Farrell Alexander Hasudungan Komansilan, Yulia Magdalena · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.