Sep 2026· World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews· Vol 31, pp. 881-886· 0 citations
TL;DR
The Specification Governance and Validation Framework is proposed, a design-science artifact that treats structured specifications as an external control plane for agentic software engineering and provides a reproducible governance model and a basis for future empirical validation of specification-driven enterprise AI development.
Abstract
AI coding assistants are evolving into agents that can plan, edit repositories, run tools, test software, and prepare deployable changes. Natural-language prompts are useful for expressing intent, but they rarely encode the complete set of enterprise requirements that govern architecture, cybersecurity, reliability, and operations. This study proposes the Specification Governance and Validation Framework (SGVF), a design-science artifact that treats structured specifications as an external control plane for agentic software engineering. SGVF separates requirements into functional, architecture, security, and operational contracts; introduces a Specification Compliance Score (SCS) with mandatory control vetoes; classifies change risk to determine permissible autonomy; and records traceability evidence from business intent through deployment. The framework was evaluated analytically through six enterprise scenarios and qualitative comparison with traditional, prompt-based, vibe-coding, and ungoverned agentic approaches. The evaluation shows how SGVF produces explicit release decisions for authorization failures, architecture drift, vulnerable dependencies, operational regressions, privileged changes, and compliant low-risk work. The study does not claim measured productivity or defect-reduction gains. It provides a reproducible governance model and a basis for future empirical validation of specification-driven enterprise AI development.
Organizations deploying agentic artificial intelligence must determine more than whether a model is trustworthy; they must establish what to validate, control, and observe for a use case to deliver its intended outcome while meeting applicable obligations. This paper proposes AI-GRACE (Agentic Intelligence-Governance,...
Business requirements for enterprise software systems are rarely captured in structured form; the logic resides instead in source code, configuration files, and institutional memory. When these systems must be migrated, extended, or audited, the absence of formal requirements artifacts forces teams into expensive, know...
Garima Agrawal, Prasun Das, L. Priyanka et al.· 0 citations
This evidence-centered structured survey synthesizes representative work available through May 31, 2026 across software engineering tasks, software security tasks, adaptation mechanisms, artifact granularity, and evaluation design and introduces an assurance framework that separates functional correctness, security, op...
Wei Lin, Tao Zhou, Zhaofei Xie et al.· 0 citations
Modern enterprise applications rely on extensive third-party code, automated build systems, cloud-native infrastructure and rapidly changing vulnerability intelligence. Security controls are then spread out across the development, the software supply-chain assurance and production operations making it hard to relate so...
Mir Fawad, Mir Jawad Yaqoob, Khawar Muhammad Saad· American Journal of Engineer...· 0 citations
The study contributes an integrated architectural model, propositional formalization, and validation agenda for governed enterprise AI agent deployments, and introduces the co-evolution constraint: technical capability layers cannot mature independently of governance capacity.
Khammal Adil, Hamzane Ibrahim, Marzak Abdelaziz et al.· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026
Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.
Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…
AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.