Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

FedLucra: Federated Learning With Loss‐Utility Controlled Robust Aggregation

Sep 2026 · Expert systems · Vol 43 · 0 citations · 28 references
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

TL;DR

FedLucra, a modular loss‐aware aggregation framework that jointly uses client validation loss and local data volume to determine aggregation weights, is proposed and the proposed loss‐aware privacy mechanisms can improve model utility relative to uniform‐budget differential privacy in several evaluated settings.

Abstract

Federated learning enables collaborative model training without centralizing private data. However, conventional aggregation strategies generally determine client contributions primarily according to local data volume and do not directly consider differences in local model performance. To address this limitation, we propose FedLucra, a modular loss‐aware aggregation framework that jointly uses client validation loss and local data volume to determine aggregation weights. Because loss‐derived weights may vary substantially across clients and communication rounds, FedLucra incorporates Exponential Moving Average smoothing, Interquartile Range‐based score filtering, and an optional FedAvg warm‐up phase to improve aggregation stability. We further introduce Loss‐Weighted Differential Privacy and Adaptive Loss‐Weighted Differential Privacy, which transform client‐specific loss‐utility scores into bounded privacy budgets, with the adaptive variant adjusting its allocation parameters according to the round‐wise distribution of client scores. FedLucra is evaluated on MNIST, Fashion‐MNIST, and CIFAR‐10 under IID and Dirichlet non‐IID distributions with different levels of data heterogeneity and federation size, including partial client participation. Additional experiments are conducted on the real‐world State Grid Corporation of China electricity‐theft dataset, while the proposed privacy mechanisms are evaluated under multiple privacy configurations. The results show that EMA smoothing and IQR filtering significantly strengthen inverse‐loss aggregation and enable FedLucra to maintain competitive and stable performance across diverse experimental conditions. Moreover, the proposed loss‐aware privacy mechanisms can improve model utility relative to uniform‐budget differential privacy in several evaluated settings, with the observed gains depending on the dataset, aggregation method, and allocation configuration. Overall, FedLucra provides an interpretable and flexible framework for combining stable loss‐aware aggregation with client‐specific privacy‐budget allocation in federated learning.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Adaptive Local Step Tuning for federated learning under data heterogeneity

Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across decentralized clients while preserving data privacy. However, non-IID data often induces client drift and unstable convergence due to mismatched local training dynamics across clients. Standard FL methods typically utilize fixed local training budgets,...

Loc Thanh Huynh · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Fed-ARDP: An Adaptive Reputation-Driven Federated Learning Framework Using Renyi Differential Privacy

Federated Learning (FL) approach can promote collaborations of training the predictive model among distributed participants without sharing raw data, to maximize the privacy protection in the heterogeneous networked environment. Conventional FL architectures often suffer from issues like indiscriminate addition of nois...

Yethin Kumar Reddy Vutukuri, Rohith Sai Gudibandla, Dinesh Swamy Goruputi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Review on Aggregation Frameworks For High-Performance Federated Learning

This work establishes the research direction toward an adaptive weighted aggregation framework in which client contributions are dynamically adjusted using multiple performance-related indicators, expected to improve global accuracy, convergence stability, fairness, minority-class representation, and robustness to low-...

Anil Wanare, Ir.Dr. Pankaj Agarka, Hemant A. Wani et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

FedGATE: Topology‐Aware Personalized Federated Learning With Utility and Carbon‐Aware Scheduling for Mobile Traffic Prediction

Accurate mobile traffic prediction is important for proactive resource allocation, congestion management, and service assurance in fifth‐generation and emerging sixth‐generation networks. Centralized deep‐learning approaches can provide strong forecasting performance but require raw traffic data to be transferred to...

Muhammad Qasim, M. Imran, M. Bilal et al. · 0 citations
#federated learning Open access Sep 2026

Adaptive entropy and robust aggregation for client selection in federated credit risk modeling

Federated learning enables collaborative modeling for financial risk prediction including credit default and transaction fraud without exposing raw local data. However, client heterogeneity, Non-IID data distribution, and dynamic participant involvement inevitably degrade model performance and incur excessive communi...

Min Zhou, Ying-Jian An · 0 citations
#federated learning Open access Sep 2026

Understanding Differential Privacy in Decentralized Federated Learning: A Controlled Privacy–Utility Comparison

Results show that clipping, perturbation, and the learning procedure jointly influence the observed privacy–utility behavior of centralized FL and sequential Decentralized Federated Learning.

AlsharifHasan Mohamad Aburbeian, M. Fernández-Veiga, A. Fernández-Vilas et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.