Skip to content
#explainable ai Review Open access

PERSPECTIVES FROM SELECT INDIAN IT COMPANIES ON AI GOVERNANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A SURVEY AND EXPERT INTERVIEWS

Sep 2026 · International journal of research - granthaalayah · Vol 14, pp. 131-139 · 0 citations · 8 references
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

TL;DR

The findings suggest that Responsible AI Governance in Indian IT companies is not built by policy statements alone and grows where regulatory readiness and ethical culture are taken seriously and where governance is treated as an organisational capability rather than a compliance exercise.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is moving into routine business use, but many Indian IT companies still find it difficult to translate Responsible AI principles into everyday governance. This paper examines the drivers of Responsible AI Governance in Indian IT companies using a structured survey of 177 practitioners and a follow-up expert interview with some senior security and AI governance leaders to contextualise the findings. The survey instrument was built around six constructs: Transparency and Ethics in AI Systems (TEAS), Accountability and Ethical Leadership (AMEL), Organisational Culture and Ethical Climate (OCEC), Regulatory and Legal Compliance (RLC), Data Governance and Quality Control (DGQC), and Responsible AI Governance Effectiveness (RAGE). After cleaning, 176 complete cases were used for multivariate testing. Reliability was satisfactory across all constructs, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.88. Descriptive results show that respondents rated transparency and data governance relatively positively, while regulatory compliance received the lowest mean score. Correlation analysis found that all five governance dimensions were positively associated with RAGE, with RLC and OCEC showing the strongest relationships. Multiple regression explained 74.3 per cent of the variance in RAGE. In the presence of the other predictors, RLC and OCEC remained statistically significant, while TEAS, AMEL and DGQC did not retain independent significance. The interview adds practical context: the participant emphasised centralised governance, approved toolsets, mandatory checklists, training, and leadership support as the basis of responsible AI practice. The findings suggest that Responsible AI Governance in Indian IT companies is not built by policy statements alone. It grows where regulatory readiness and ethical culture are taken seriously and where governance is treated as an organisational capability rather than a compliance exercise.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence shaping ESG risk governance in banking: Evidence from a systematic literature review

The results indicate that strong governance arrangements, such as model governance, accountability frame­works, board supervision, and alignment with organizational risk appetite, are necessary for successfully deploying AI-enabled ESG.

Rini Marlina, Rosa Christiana Esti Noor Sumaryanti, Poltak Maruli John Liberty Hutagaol · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Governing Risks Arising from Institutional AI-Driven Decision Support Practices: A Case of Women Leaders in Tertiary Education

The increasing integration of large language models (LLMs) and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into tertiary education is extending artificial intelligence (AI) from teaching and learning toward institutional decision support, creating new requirements for human oversight and risk governance. This study exam...

Gadir Alomair, M. A. Salem · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

AI Governance and SME Performance: The Roles of Governance Quality, Risk Management, And Employee AI Literacy in Vietnam

This study investigates the links among AI risk management capability, internal AI governance quality, and organizational performance in SMEs while also assessing the moderating role of employee AI literacy. Building on Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Sociotechnical Systems Theory, it frames organizational performance...

Vinh Minh Vo, Linh Hac Hoang, Han Kha Luu · 0 citations
Review Open access 2025

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A REVIEW

The increasing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across corporate operations has introduced a paradigm shift in corporate governance practices in India. From automated compliance monitoring and financial analysis to predictive risk management and strategic decision-making, AI technologies are reshaping the manne...

Aditya Vikram, Pulkit Marwaha, Monu Chaudhary et al. · 0 citations
#large language models Review Open access Sep 2026

Systemic Risks and Governance of Advanced Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Review

A synthesized six-risk taxonomy; a four-level governance model spanning the individual, developer, state, and international levels; and a critical appraisal of the evidentiary basis for each risk claim suggest that dangerous outcomes are structurally plausible, though not inevitable, and that coordinated multilevel gov...

Joey O. Chua, E. Ayo, Josan D. Tamayo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of HR Governance: A Review of Ethics, Risk Management, and Regulatory Compliance

Responsible AI governance should become a strategic component of modern HR management, enabling global organizations to balance technological innovation with employee rights, organizational accountability, and sustainable regulatory compliance.

Jaganathan Balaji · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 30, 2026

Q&A: Hey AI, who should I vote for this year?

MIT professors Adam Berinsky and Chara Podimata discuss a new project to track how AI chatbots are responding to questions about the 2026 U.S. midterm elections.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 30, 2026

From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence

Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.

GPT-Lab Oct 30, 2026

Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation

Critical flaws, compromised release channels and agentic AI threats landed within days of each other in mid-October 2026. Why “Black October” may say more about how well we now find weaknesses than about the attacks themselves. The post Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.