Skip to content

A Vision-Language Foundation Model for Precise and Comprehensive Brain Tumor Diagnosis from Preoperative Multimodal Data

Sep 2026 · 0 citations
Computer Science

Abstract

We developed BrainVLM to classify all 12 World Health Organization (WHO) 2021 brain tumor types. BrainVLM integrates an uncertainty quantification strategy to indicate prediction reliability and a module for generating radiology reports to elucidate the clinical rationale. BrainVLM was trained on multi-modal data (MRI scans, demographics, and radiology reports) from 40,043 individuals. It was validated on 5,211 patients with pathologically confirmed brain tumors, including 3,877 held-out patients from the primary hospital and 1,334 patients from 11 independent hospitals. We further conducted two proof-of-concept studies to validate its clinical utility in AI-clinician workflows: 1) a blinded multireader study where 12 neuroradiologists across varying experience levels interpreted 248 retrospective cases with or without AI assistance, and 2) a real-world prospective study in which 1,009 patients were independently and blindly assessed by BrainVLM and radiologists before surgery. Additionally, we demonstrated BrainVLM's utility in preoperative molecular subgroup prediction for adult-type diffuse gliomas, using a multi-center cohort of 632 patients. In primary evaluation, BrainVLM achieved an area under the curve (macro-AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84-0.86), and an F1 score of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81-0.83), surpassing neuroradiologists (F1 = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79-0.81)). In external validation across 11 centers, BrainVLM achieved an AUC = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79-0.82) and F1 = 0.75 (95% CI: 0.73-0.78), compared with F1 = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69-0.73) for neuroradiologists. In prospective real-world evaluation, BrainVLM maintained performance comparable to neuroradiologists. The BrainVLM project page is available at https://hku-healthai.github.io/brainvlm_project.github.io/.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.