Skip to content

Measuring AI Leadership: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure for AI-Native Organizations

Sep 2026 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

The AI Leadership Battery is developed, which organizes 36 behaviorally specific subdimensions into 11 theory-specified content families and provides researchers with a behavioral framework for examining how leaders in AI-enabled work regulate judgment, learning, adaptation, transparency, and accountability.

Abstract

AI is changing what leaders must judge, explain, learn, and coordinate, yet existing measures do not capture these behaviors at the level needed to study leadership in AI-enabled work. We develop the AI Leadership Battery, which organizes 36 behaviorally specific subdimensions into 11 theory-specified content families. Following established scale-development procedures, the research used deductive item generation; content validation of definitional correspondence and definitional distinctiveness; exploratory factor analysis and item reduction; confirmatory factor analysis in independent samples; and tests of internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and criterion-related and incremental validity. Across the development and validation studies, the analyses provided evidence for the Battery's content, multidimensional structure, reliability, and distinction from selected orbiting constructs. The Battery also contributed additional information beyond orbiting constructs across organizational growth, decision speed, customer/stakeholder response capability, AI-enabled team performance, AI-enabled work experience, AI security and risk management, and AI adoption and integration. The resulting measure provides researchers with a behavioral framework for examining how leaders in AI-enabled work regulate judgment, learning, adaptation, transparency, and accountability.

View source

Similar papers

#explainable ai Open access Sep 2026

Cognitive Performance Under AI Advice: Development and Initial Validation of a CHC-Informed Assessment for Organizational Decision-Making

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in organizational decision-making, requiring employees not only to use AI-generated recommendations but also to evaluate their quality and determine when reliance is appropriate. Although established research examines behavioral reliance on algorithmic and AI advice...

Filiz Mızrak, Turhan Karakaya, Burcak Vatansever Durmaz · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Leadership as a boundary condition on trust in AI: Transformational leadership, leader-member exchange, and employee intentions to use generative AI

The onset of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has outpaced organizations’ understanding of what makes employees willing to use it. This study asks whether leadership quality shapes how employees translate beliefs about AI into intentions to use it at work. Adapting the multidimensional online trust instrument...

Mark A. Irwin, Yujong Hwang · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Positive psychology for executives in the wake of AI

The purpose of this paper is to integrate positive psychology and artificial intelligence (AI) into leadership development by proposing a six-dimensional model for preparing executives to lead effectively in AI-intensive organizational environments. Drawing on a conceptual synthesis of peer-reviewed literatu...

Michael J. Provitera, Mostafa Sayyadi, H. Kazeroony · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

AI Perception, Work Changes, and Readiness for Change in Organizations: A Cross-Sector Study

This study examines employees’ readiness for AI-related organizational change by integrating AI perception, work reconfiguration, organizational conditions, and trust within a socio-technical perspective. A cross-sectional survey of 276 employees from six sectors in Croatia combined theory-guided operational composites...

Biljana Marković, A. Mandić, Jelena Blaži · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

LEADERSHIP ROLES IN AI IMPLEMENTATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF SOCIO-TECHNICAL ALIGNMENT

It is argued that AI implementation reconfigures established leadership functions rather than replacing them and positions leadership as a practical mechanism of socio-technical alignment in AI-enabled organizational change.

Feruza Abdivalieva · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI, PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY, AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF MODERN LEADERSHIP

The study demonstrates that digital and AI tools reduce employees’ reliance on hierarchical leadership while psychological safety significantly drives team innovation and performance.

Ying-Ru Zeng · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.