Skip to content

F(AI)2R: Who Did What, and Who Checked? Verifiable AI Provenance as an Executable Skill

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.25637 · 0 citations · 59 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

F(AI)2R is FAIR research with AI in the loop, twice: an AI-assisted authoring pass and a machine-readable audit pass over every artefact, and its provenance model is generalized into aiprov, a PROV-O extension covering any AI-in-the-loop artefact, and package the method as an executable skill that an AI agent operates itself.

Abstract

F(AI)2R is FAIR research with AI in the loop, twice: an AI-assisted authoring pass and a machine-readable audit pass over every artefact. AI systems now draft, refactor, and verify research artefacts, yet their contributions are rarely recorded in a form a later human or machine can audit. Building on the original F(AI)2R experiment, we generalize its provenance model beyond scholarly writing into aiprov, a PROV-O extension covering any AI-in-the-loop artefact, and we package the method as an executable skill that an AI agent operates itself: setup asks the human operator for their ORCID ID, resolves their identity from the public registry, and scaffolds continuous integration that gates every push on graph conformance and publishes the current build of this very paper. The paper is its own case study. Every activity, claim, and source in its production is recorded in the repository's provenance graph under two invariants: no parentless claim, and verification rungs that only humans may grant.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

EviGuard: Machine-Verifiable Evidence Grounding for LLM-Based Industrial Incident Reasoning

EviGuard is presented, a system that decides when an LLM’s understanding is trustworthy enough to act on and has an ensemble of deterministic verifiers label every claim supported, contradicted, or unknown against the graph—honoring interval time, event-time policy and credential versions, network reachability, and phy...

Hao-Zhe Zhou, Hang Lei, Mao-Lin Yang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Between the Commits: Process, Error, and Claim Reliability in a Wholly AI-Authored Codebase

We present: (i) a new dataset consisting of the full development history of a 21,000-line Python tool built entirely by Claude AI, with no human-authored code or tests, (ii) two code-provenance tracing tools, (iii) three taxonomies for instruction intent, commit provenance, and response reliability, (iv) application of...

D. Leith · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Auditable AI-Assisted Research Writing: An Engineering Discipline with Pre-Registered Process Observation

An auditability discipline built at production time is specified: git sealing with an anchor lineage, hash-bound provenance, red-line gates that refuse non-compliant artifacts and log every refusal, cross-model role separation, and programmatic assembly from registered sources.

Yangshuo Zhou, Cheng-Qun Yu · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Trust the Spec, Not the Code - A Specification-First, AI-Assisted Case Study in Online Banking

It is argued that AI removes much of that cost: natural language enriched with lightweight mathematics, written in \LaTeX, can serve as an intermediate specification language that is precise enough to reason over and prove, while a large language model reviews it for ambiguity, drafts proofs, and generates the implemen...

E. Farchi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.