Sep 2026· ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO)· 0 citations· 31 references
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become a fundamental tool for learning over graph-structured data. Under the message-passing framework, mainstream GNN models alternate between feature transformation and neighborhood aggregation. Fusing these two phases into a node-level pipelined push dataflow, in which each node’s transformed feature streams directly into aggregation, establishes a single-pass I/O target that reads each input tensor exactly once per layer. No existing hardware sustains this dataflow at full concurrency. Prior fusion accelerators fall short of this target in three ways: designs that gather the raw input features for aggregation or write transformed features off-chip incur redundant traffic, designs that stream transformed features on-chip still keep the two phases as separate matrix kernels without a unified execution granularity, and the designs that aggregate at message granularity serialize per-destination aggregation or allocate state that does not scale to large graphs. We propose PipeGNN, a bandwidth-efficient GNN accelerator whose streaming microarchitecture sustains this dataflow as a fully concurrent pipeline within a fixed on-chip buffer budget. PipeGNN decouples execution from topological boundaries by aligning execution granularity with both memory burst size and aggregation compute throughput, and resolves four coupled microarchitectural barriers through coordinated mechanisms: compute-aligned edge batching, contention-aware message reduction, adaptive cross-batch scheduling, and tiered state residency. Evaluated across diverse GNN workloads, PipeGNN achieves geometric mean speedups of 10.1 × over AWB-GCN and 12.2 × over FlowGNN, and 2.4 × to 46.9 × over a GPU baseline across graph scales, reduces off-chip traffic by 2.69 × over AWB-GCN and 5.93 × over FlowGNN, and improves energy efficiency by 56.81 × over AWB-GCN and 1.53 × over FlowGNN, with a 154 × traffic reduction and a 116.81 × energy reduction against HyGCN.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comJul 13, 2026
Cryptographic code supports vital protections in modern computing systems. Learn how a new method helps verify code as developers write it while preserving speed and adaptability as it gets implemented and evolves. The post Verifying Rust cryptography in SymCrypt, from standards to code appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduJul 6, 2026
PhD student Rachel Sava, winner of the Envisioning the Future of Computing Prize, explores transformative improvements and dystopian risks of neural technology.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 2, 2026