Skip to content

Accelerating Sharded Data Parallelism at Scale with Federated Learning

Sep 2026 · European Conference on Parallel Processing · pp. 437-451 · 0 citations · 24 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Inspired by the efficient communication principles of federated learning (FL), this work introduces two hybrid algorithms - FL+FSDP and FL+HSDP - interleaving sharded DP with FedAvg-style aggregations, demonstrating superior computational efficiency and improved model quality.

Abstract

The symbiotic scaling of artificial intelligence models and high-performance computing systems continually creates algorithmic challenges in their convergence. Foundation models (FMs) are a crucial example, requiring months-long training on thousands of cutting-edge GPUs. Sharded data parallelism (DP) is the dominant strategy to accelerate such computations by splitting data and models across multiple GPUs. However, it incurs prohibitive communication overhead when deployed at scale, particularly on multi-tier interconnects with heterogeneous performance. Inspired by the efficient communication principles of federated learning (FL), this work introduces two hybrid algorithms - FL+FSDP and FL+HSDP - interleaving sharded DP with FedAvg-style aggregations. Such approaches decouple large DP deployments into smaller, loosely-coupled federation groups, requiring minimal inter-group traffic while keeping the global batch size bounded by the groups'size. Formal analysis of communication costs and experimental validation prove their scalability and flexibility. A Llama3.1 8B pre-training on 512 A100 GPUs shows that, under identical hyperparameters, FL+FSDP and FL+HSDP achieve up to 8.04 faster data processing and 4.48 lower evaluation perplexity than their counterparts, demonstrating superior computational efficiency and improved model quality. These properties stem from reduced communication overhead and the bounded growth of the global batch size relative to the federation group size.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

COMPASS-ABS: Reducing Fragmentation in Shared GPU Clusters for Deep Learning Training Workloads

SIF is introduced, a metric built on the notion of partial-nodes that is independent of historical workload knowledge that matches both theory and production and COMPASS-ABS is proposed, which employs the COMPact-ASSured (COMPASS) algorithm to confine the cluster state within a tight Anchor-Based Space (ABS).

Yu-Kai Zhou, Hong-Fan Wu · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ShardMeter: Sharded and Geo-Distributed Training Without the Guesswork

ShardMeter is introduced, a lightweight analytical performance model that predicts the end-to-end runtime of transformer-based workloads across arbitrary sharded, distributed, and even decentralized training.

Tim Beringer, Patrick Diem, Felix Wolf et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

A Survey: Lossless Model Accuracy Data Partitioning and Training Parallelism Strategies for Distributed Machine Learning

In the digital era of big data and large-scale models, conventional stand-alone computing power and storage approach fails to meet the demands of large-scale machine learning models, therefore, distributed data parallelism has been the key supporting techn ology for breaking hardware bottleneck. However, current distri...

Jin-Hui Xia · 0 citations
Sep 2026

LineShine: online acceleration for HPC-AI converged scientific computing

LineShine is presented, a newly deployed exascale supercomputer whose online acceleration architecture provides a new design point for converged HPC and AI and demonstrates that its balanced architecture and software stack can translate system capability into high throughput, robust scalability, and sustained scientifi...

Yu-Tong Lu, Guang-Nan Feng, Hao-Huan Fu · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Characterizing the Scalability and Performance of Large-Scale AI Training Under Multi-Tenancy

This work designs a benchmark suite of AI models to evaluate the performance of five distinct parallelisation strategies across different supercomputing clusters, including Alps, Leonardo, LUMI, JUPITER, NVL72 GB300, and DGX A100.

Jacopo Raffi, Thomas Pasquali, Lorenzo Piarulli et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.