Jul 2026· Journal of Management Education· 0 citations· 71 references
TL;DR
By making the pedagogical architecture of ethical AI literacy explicit, the article offers a structured reference for curriculum design, accreditation processes, and lifelong managerial learning, providing actionable guidance for business schools and universities.
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence increasingly shapes organizational decision-making, managers must move beyond functional literacy toward critical engagement with its ethical, social, and governance implications. Despite growing AI ethics scholarship, a gap persists in how these competencies can be systematically developed within management education. This study addresses this gap by proposing the Ethical AI Literacy Framework for Management Education, a pedagogical architecture grounded in qualitative synthesis. Methodologically, the article conducts a systematic literature review of 581 peer-reviewed studies to map the multidisciplinary landscape of AI ethics in professional training. To overcome thematic fragmentation, an in-depth thematic analysis of 22 core studies was undertaken. Through abductive coding, these contributions were synthesized to identify recurrent pedagogical logics and competence clusters informing the framework’s construction. The resulting framework articulates three developmental blocks: conceptual foundations of AI systems; ethical reasoning and reflection; and applied managerial context—complemented by a cross-cutting dimension dedicated to curricular integration and evaluation. By making the pedagogical architecture of ethical AI literacy explicit, the article offers a structured reference for curriculum design, accreditation processes, and lifelong managerial learning, providing actionable guidance for business schools and universities.
The study identifies a persistent fragmentation in existing research and proposes the Integrated Challenge Model for AI Curriculum Development (ICM-AI-CD), which conceptualizes AI integration as a dynamic socio-technical system comprising interdependent ethical-policy, pedagogical-design, and technical-institutional do...
Abdul Malik· Applied Business: Issues &am...· 0 citations
Business schools need to prepare graduates for workplaces in which generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) shapes analysis, communication, customer insight, and decision support. Yet the field still lacks a business-school-specific account of what students should learn beyond tool familiarity. This structured narrat...
Rich Yueh· International Journal of Bus...· 0 citations
It is proposed that AI literacy is no longer an isolated technical skill but a mandatory pillar of modern civic and professional competence, demanding immediate, equitable integration into global educational curricula and organizational training paradigms.
Cyrus D. Santiago· American Journal of Data Sci...· 0 citations
The research outcomes demonstrate that AIAS functions effectively as a learning architecture, aligning academic integrity with instructional design, and offers a replicable model for fashion programs and other disciplines seeking responsible AI integration.
D. Shen· PUPIL International Journal...· 0 citations
A five-dimensional AI literacy framework -including instrumental, algorithmic, ethical, epistemological, and institutional dimensions- is proposed herein, which suggests that university educators must be capable of critically reviewing AI results, defending academic integrity, and working within a clear governance stru...
Mayra Bustillos, Yolvy Quintero, Dílida Luengo et al.· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
A policy-oriented posthuman framework for interpreting AI integration in architectural pedagogy and translating it into responsible design education principles is developed, which clarifies the theoretical relevance of posthuman pedagogy for AI-supported architectural education.