Skip to content
Open access

Therapist-guided and self-guided internet-based behavioural activation versus treatment as usual for adolescents with depression: randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation

Aug 2026 · BMJ mental health · Vol 29 · 0 citations · 54 references
Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background Adolescent depression is a major public health concern with limited access to effective treatments. Behavioural activation (BA) is a suitable intervention for digital delivery, but definitive adolescent trials are scarce. Objective To evaluate whether therapist-guided and self-guided internet-based BA (I-BA) are more efficacious and cost-effective than treatment as usual (TAU) for adolescents with mild to moderate major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods Single-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. A total of 219 adolescents (13–17 years) with mild-moderate MDD were randomised (1:1:1) to 10 weeks of therapist-guided I-BA, self-guided I-BA or TAU. Both I-BA interventions included adolescent and parent modules. Primary outcome: change in depression severity (Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised, CDRS-R, range 17–113) from baseline to 3-month follow-up (primary endpoint), assessed by blinded evaluators. Analyses included all randomised participants, with statisticians blinded to allocation. A health economic evaluation was performed at the primary endpoint. Findings Baseline CDRS-R indicated clinically significant depression (mean 57.1, threshold ≥40). Retention at the primary endpoint was 82.6%. Mean reductions were 17.0 (therapist-guided I-BA), 16.0 (self-guided I-BA) and 11.6 (TAU), bringing both I-BA groups below the clinical cut-off. Therapist-guided I-BA showed greater reductions than TAU (estimated mean difference −4.68; 95% CI −0.05 to −9.30; p=0.048, d=−0.47; 95% CI 0.00 to −0.93), while self-guided I-BA was not statistically superior (estimated mean difference −3.44; 95% CI −8.05 to 1.17, p=0.14, d=−0.37; 95% CI −0.86 to 0.12). The predefined six-point clinical important difference was not met. Results were sensitive to modelling: significance disappeared with random slopes but effect estimates were similar; baseline-adjusted analyses favoured both I-BA arms. Both I-BA options had lower costs than TAU (p=0.03, p<0.001), with self-guided I-BA being the most economical. Conclusions Therapist-guided I-BA reduced depressive symptoms at lower cost than TAU, but clinical importance and robustness are uncertain. Self-guided I-BA showed no clear superiority but was cost-efficient. Clinical implications Therapist-guided I-BA may increase access to evidence-based care for adolescents with MDD, though findings require cautious interpretation. Self-guided I-BA may be useful where therapist access is limited, but more research is needed.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.