Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Leveraging Federated Learning, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, and Governance Requirements for Privacy-Preserving Multisite Clinical Diagnostic Platforms: A Scoping Review Protocol

Sep 2026 · Open Science Framework

Abstract

This registration presents the protocol for a prospective scoping review of the technical, implementation and governance evidence needed to design, evaluate and govern privacy-preserving multisite clinical diagnostic artificial intelligence platforms. The review will examine federated-learning architectures and aggregation strategies, privacy-preserving mechanisms, explainability and interpretability methods, fairness auditing and bias mitigation, interoperability standards, validation and deployment practices, regulatory conformity, data governance, implementation barriers and facilitators, and equity considerations. The review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework, Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and PRISMA-ScR reporting recommendations. Literature published in English from 1 January 2017 onward will be searched in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, IEEE Xplore, the ACM Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Database searching will be supplemented by regulatory and standards documentation, preprint servers and backward and forward citation tracking. The review is expected to produce an evidence-gap map, a requirements-engineering maturity landscape, a regulatory-alignment summary, an analysis of implementation barriers and facilitators, and a prioritised, evidence-traceable framework of technical, governance and implementation requirements for federated and explainable diagnostic platforms intended for deployment across high-income and resource-variable healthcare settings. Formal searching, screening and data charting have not yet begun and will commence after prospective registration

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.