Skip to content
Review Open access

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SIRSL: GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS

Jul 2026 · Revista de Estudos Interdisciplinares · 0 citations

TL;DR

It is concluded that SIRSL is functionally viable and has the potential to make systematic reviews more integrated, organized, and traceable, however, further validation across different research fields and documentary datasets is still required.

Abstract

The expansion of scientific production and the fragmentation of tools used in Systematic Literature Reviews hinder the organization, traceability, and integration of methodological stages. This study aimed to develop and functionally validate the Intelligent System for Systematic Literature Reviews (SIRSL), based on Generative Artificial Intelligence. This applied technological research adopted a descriptive approach and was conducted through iterative stages involving requirements assessment, system modeling, implementation, testing, and refinement. The system was developed using React, TypeScript, Node.js, and Firebase, integrating the Gemini model. Functional validation was carried out by applying SIRSL to a systematic review associated with a doctoral research project within the PPGADT. The initial corpus comprised 470 records, of which 58 were excluded after duplicate identification and application of the selection criteria, leaving 412 documents. The results demonstrated that SIRSL integrated functionalities for developing search strategies, importing files, detecting duplicates, screening studies, extracting data, producing indicators, and generating reports. Artificial Intelligence was employed as an assistive resource, while methodological decisions remained under the researchers’ responsibility. It is concluded that SIRSL is functionally viable and has the potential to make systematic reviews more integrated, organized, and traceable. However, further validation across different research fields and documentary datasets is still required.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence Resources for the Screening of Titles and Abstracts in Systematic Reviews: A Scoping Review

This review aims to identify current evidence concerning AI use during preliminary SLR reference screening and describes characteristics such as the different metrics used for reporting performance and how the different algorithms, pipelines, workflows or web applications are validated.

A. M. Barragán, Sara Elena Ortiz Bonett, Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Charting the Evolution of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Insights from A Systematic Literature Review

This review highlights the field's strong interdisciplinary character and reveals the current challenges that the sector faces, and outlines a systematic research program to guide further studies of the implementation, impact, and problems of GenAI in enterprises and communities.

Majdouline Attaoui, Wissal Attaoui, Anas Moukrim et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Automated Code Review in DevOps Pipelines using Artificial Intelligence

In Ensuring fast and precise code review process has become one of the major problems of the modern DevOps world, where software development happens quickly for code reviews to be done manually. In this paper, we introduce a novel automated code review framework named AICR-DevOps, which utilizes a combination of rule-b...

Nawnit Kumar, M. K. Shukla, Raushendra Kumar et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative AI in Manufacturing and Industrial Contexts: A Systematic Review of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

This PRISMA-guided bibliometric and abstract-level thematic review maps peer-reviewed industrial GAI research published from 2022 to 4 June 2026 contributes a reproducible cross-domain map, an overlap-aware synthesis, and stakeholder-specific guidance for trustworthy industrial GAI.

Galina Ilieva, Yuliy Iliev · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Requirement Classification and Prioritization Using Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing

The results indicate that transformer-based representations offer a modest but consistent improvement in contextual understanding over TF-IDF, while classical classifiers remain competitive and considerably cheaper to train.

Sai Sindhuja Bhukya, Naveen Kumar Nuthanapati · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.