Sep 2026· European Journal of Social Psychology· 0 citations· 97 references
TL;DR
It is found that individuals are generally reluctant to cooperate with AI possessing partial decision‐making authority, and this reluctance is shaped by perceived AI perspective‐taking, and it is suggested that psychologically anthropomorphic design may foster more effective human–AI interaction.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly autonomous, its interactions with humans increasingly resemble social relationships, giving rise to a novel form of cooperation—human–AI teaming. Drawing on social cognition theory, the present research examines how individuals’ perceived AI perspective–taking shapes their willingness to cooperate. Across five studies, we find that individuals are generally reluctant to cooperate with AI possessing partial decision‐making authority (Studies 1 and 2), and this reluctance is shaped by perceived AI perspective‐taking (Studies 3 and 4). When AI agents appear to accurately—or even slightly overestimate—the thoughts and feelings of individuals experiencing unfair situations, perceived AI perspective–taking increases, thereby enhancing their willingness to cooperate with AI (Study 5). These findings extend perspective–taking research from human–human to human–AI contexts, highlighting that cooperation with AI depends not only on instrumental outcomes but also on social–cognitive inferences about being understood, and suggesting that psychologically anthropomorphic design may foster more effective human–AI interaction.
This work argues that the prevailing perspective on AI agent design is insufficient for achieving desirable social welfare, not merely due to computational or regulatory constraints, and outlines a bold vision: the development of a unified theoretical and empirical framework that supports the investigation of the use c...
Moshe Tennenholtz, Omer Madmon· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
It is shown that trust in AI is associated with both the facilitation and the perceived constraint of organizational decision-making, and it highlights accountability as a candidate governance mechanism for preserving self-reported human judgment in AI-assisted environments, pending behavioral validation.
Youngkeun Choi· Human Systems Management· 0 citations
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly engage users in value-laden discussions, a key concern is whether they shape not only what people decide but how confident they feel. We examined confidence amplification, shifts in certainty without decision reversals, in human–AI moral decision-making. In a 2 (Time...
Meng-Yao Li, Trevor Patten, Nishthaa Lekhi et al.· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
This review advances three claims: first, AI anthropomorphism operates at two levels: design-based manipulations that companies can implement to make their technologies more humanlike, and individual tendencies to anthropomorphize those technologies.
Sara Kim, Jiajun Liu· Current Opinion in Psycholog...· 1 citation
The widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed the way people acquire knowledge, solve problems, and make decisions in both academic and professional settings. While these technologies improve efficiency and accessibility, their growing use has raised important psycholo...
K. Rosini· International Journal of Law...· 0 citations
Since the advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI), interactions between humans and AI have greatly changed society. Previous research indicates that AI's effectiveness depends on individuals' cognitive and emotional trust, and that increasing AI agency also affects its perceived trustworthiness. However, it i...
Aki Nagano· 6th Current Issues in Busine...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.