Skip to content
Review Open access

Incidence and Risk Factors for Free Flap Compromise in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis.

Aug 2026 · Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery · 0 citations · 78 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Findings support integrating modifiable physiological markers into preoperative risk stratification and implementing targeted, multidisciplinary optimization strategies to improve flap outcomes.

Abstract

Objective

Microvascular free flap reconstruction is the gold standard for head and neck defects, but flap compromise remains a primary cause of reconstructive failure. This study aims to evaluate the pooled incidence of flap compromise and total flap failure, and to identify risk factors to optimize perioperative management. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published up to September 1, 2025. REVIEW

Methods

This meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled incidences and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Forty-seven studies involving 30,002 free flaps were included. The pooled incidence of flap compromise was 8.2% (95% CI: 6.6%-9.9%), with a complete failure rate of 3.9% (95% CI: 3.2%-4.7%). Flap compromise was significantly associated with prior radiotherapy (OR = 3.98). Other significant non-modifiable factors included diabetes (OR = 2.20), advanced age (OR = 1.35), and high comorbidity scores (OR = 1.68). Importantly, several modifiable factors were identified as critical drivers, including fluid overload (OR = 2.57), prolonged operative time (OR = 2.14), low serum albumin (OR = 2.06), low BMI (OR = 1.75), and low hemoglobin (OR = 1.34).

Conclusion

Free flap compromise remains a clinically significant complication. These findings support integrating modifiable physiological markers into preoperative risk stratification and implementing targeted, multidisciplinary optimization strategies to improve flap outcomes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

The Fibula Free Flap as Used for Reconstruction in Patients With Oral Cavity Malignancy: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT Objectives The fibula free flap is a widely used means of reconstructing the maxilla and mandible. It is used for a variety of indications, including for reconstruction after resection of a benign or malignant tumor, osteoradionecrosis, or trauma. The current literature reports outcomes for the fibula free fla...

Rohan Vuppala, Nicholas Owings, Forest Weir · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Frailty and Recovery Following Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.

In patients undergoing MFFR, frailty was consistently associated with medical morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and worse functional outcomes andFrailty assessment tools may have an important role in preoperative patient counseling and anticipating discharge needs.

Anvitha R. Metpally, Mitchell T. Victor, Mirian Ramirez et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of AI in Prediction and Assessment of Compromised Free Flaps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Vascular compromise remains the leading cause of free-flap failure. AI-based monitoring and prediction tools have emerged as a promising adjunct for postoperative free flap monitoring and early detection of vascular compromise. Previous systematic reviews included limited evidence or broadly evaluat...

Kuan-Chen Huang, Melanie J. Wang, Y. Chu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Nasolabial Flap in Oncologic Oral Cavity Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES To systematically evaluate the outcomes of nasolabial flap (NSFL) reconstruction for oncologic oral cavity defects. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed and reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar were sea...

F. Maglitto, V. Scocca, G. Salzano et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Primary and Secondary Implantation in Mandibular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE To identify clinical factors influencing implant placement/timing decisions, through comparing survival, success, and complication rates of primary and secondary dental implantation following mandibular reconstruction. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Centra...

Laura Zsófia Tasi, Ábel Major, A. S. Wenning et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Comparative outcomes in fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Meta-analysis and GRADE evaluation of the evidence.

PURPOSE Despite the high incidence of 5th metacarpal neck (5MCN) fracture, the literature lacks concise information about the ideal treatment option. This review aimed to compare the functional outcome of conservative and operative management of 5MCN fractures. METHODS The electronic databases PubMed and Scopus were...

A. Mohabey, A. Dubepuria, S. Barik et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.