Skip to content

Adaptive Bayesian Optimization for Reinforcement Learning Reward Shaping

Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

Abstract

Reward shaping is a critical technique in reinforcement learning (RL) that aims to accelerate learning by providing the agent with informative rewards. However, designing effective reward shaping functions can be a challenging and often tedious process, requiring domain expertise and extensive manual tuning. This paper proposes an adaptive Bayesian optimization approach to automate the reward shaping process. The system iteratively explores the space of potential reward functions, leveraging the agent's performance as feedback to refine the search strategy. We demonstrate that this approach can learn optimal reward shaping functions, leading to significant improvements in learning speed and agent performance compared to traditional reward shaping methods. The core claim is that an adaptive Bayesian optimization framework can effectively automate the reward shaping process, offering a more robust and efficient solution for complex RL problems. The system utilizes a Gaussian Process (GP) surrogate model to approximate the reward function landscape and employs an acquisition function, such as Expected Improvement, to guide the exploration process. The approach is evaluated on a suite of benchmark RL environments, showcasing its effectiveness across diverse scenarios. This work contributes to the broader field of RL by providing a practical and automated method for reward shaping, potentially unlocking new possibilities for tackling challenging RL problems.

View source

Similar papers

AI-Enabled Performance-Based Procurement and Life-Cycle Maintenance of Highway Bridges: Integrating Single-Bid Risk Analytics and PPP Payment Optimization

Model-based life-cycle evaluation indicates that AI-optimized PPP contracts reduce bridges reaching emergency condition by 30%–40% over a 30-year horizon while lowering life-cycle costs by 8%–12% compared with rule-based policies, providing infrastructure agencies and private concessionaires with an integrated AI-driven life-cycle management platform.

Ali Shehadeh, Odey Alshboul · 0 citations
#reinforcement learning Open access Aug 2026

DIArc Foundational Note v0.1 — Minimum Claim Edition

Abstract The rapid development of artificial intelligence has significantly increased the availability of information, analytical capability, and machine-assisted reasoning. However, greater access to information does not necessarily produce better decisions. In many organizational contexts, the emerging bottleneck is no longer information acquisition, but the human and organizational capacity to determine what information is sufficient, when analysis should stop, when a decision should be made, and how outcomes should improve future judgment. This Foundational Note introduces Decision Intelligence Architecture (DIArc) as an architectural framework for Human–AI collaborative decision systems. DIArc is based on a central proposition: in the AI era, competitive advantage increasingly depends not on maximizing information, but on maximizing the rate at which high-quality decisions generate learning and improve judgment, under explicit constraints on information consumption and decision cycles. The architecture is organized into four theoretical layers. First, the Capability Inversion Hypothesis describes a structural shift in which information, knowledge, and analysis become increasingly abundant while judgment, commitment, execution, and learning become comparatively scarce capabilities. Second, Identity-driven Information Consumption (IDIC) describes a decision failure mechanism in which continued information consumption may serve identity reinforcement rather than decision improvement. Third, the Decision Constraint Architecture, comprising Decision Information Budget (DIB) and Decision Cycle Budget (DCB), introduces explicit constraints on information consumption and analytical iteration. Fourth, High-quality Decision Velocity (HQDV) describes the performance objective of accelerating completed high-quality decision loops, while Judgment Evolution Rate (JER) represents the longer-term evolutionary objective of improving judgment through outcome-based learning. This note constitutes the initial public disclosure of the DIArc architecture and establishes its theoretical baseline for subsequent research and branch concepts.

Lucas Xiaochun Xu · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 27, 2026

Looking beyond natural sequences

A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.