Skip to content

Probabilistic Programming for Reinforcement Learning with Exploration

Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) faces significant challenges in achieving optimal performance due to the inherent difficulty in balancing exploration and exploitation. This paper proposes a novel framework leveraging probabilistic programming (PP) to address this problem. The core idea is to represent an RL agent as a probabilistic program, enabling the explicit modeling of uncertainty within the environment and the agent itself. This allows for the incorporation of Bayesian approaches to exploration, where actions are actively sampled based on predicted rewards and a quantified measure of uncertainty. Unlike traditional RL methods that often rely on heuristics or point-estimate models, this approach provides a more principled and flexible framework for exploration, potentially leading to improved sample efficiency and overall performance, particularly in complex and partially observable environments. The framework utilizes concepts from Bayesian inference, Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), and probabilistic programming to define a coherent and powerful approach to RL. Key elements include the definition of probability distributions for state values, action values, and transition probabilities, and the application of variational inference or other inference techniques to estimate these distributions. This allows the agent to learn not just optimal actions, but also a representation of its knowledge about the environment.

View source

Similar papers

AI-Enabled Performance-Based Procurement and Life-Cycle Maintenance of Highway Bridges: Integrating Single-Bid Risk Analytics and PPP Payment Optimization

Model-based life-cycle evaluation indicates that AI-optimized PPP contracts reduce bridges reaching emergency condition by 30%–40% over a 30-year horizon while lowering life-cycle costs by 8%–12% compared with rule-based policies, providing infrastructure agencies and private concessionaires with an integrated AI-driven life-cycle management platform.

Ali Shehadeh, Odey Alshboul · 0 citations
#reinforcement learning Open access Aug 2026

DIArc Foundational Note v0.1 — Minimum Claim Edition

Abstract The rapid development of artificial intelligence has significantly increased the availability of information, analytical capability, and machine-assisted reasoning. However, greater access to information does not necessarily produce better decisions. In many organizational contexts, the emerging bottleneck is no longer information acquisition, but the human and organizational capacity to determine what information is sufficient, when analysis should stop, when a decision should be made, and how outcomes should improve future judgment. This Foundational Note introduces Decision Intelligence Architecture (DIArc) as an architectural framework for Human–AI collaborative decision systems. DIArc is based on a central proposition: in the AI era, competitive advantage increasingly depends not on maximizing information, but on maximizing the rate at which high-quality decisions generate learning and improve judgment, under explicit constraints on information consumption and decision cycles. The architecture is organized into four theoretical layers. First, the Capability Inversion Hypothesis describes a structural shift in which information, knowledge, and analysis become increasingly abundant while judgment, commitment, execution, and learning become comparatively scarce capabilities. Second, Identity-driven Information Consumption (IDIC) describes a decision failure mechanism in which continued information consumption may serve identity reinforcement rather than decision improvement. Third, the Decision Constraint Architecture, comprising Decision Information Budget (DIB) and Decision Cycle Budget (DCB), introduces explicit constraints on information consumption and analytical iteration. Fourth, High-quality Decision Velocity (HQDV) describes the performance objective of accelerating completed high-quality decision loops, while Judgment Evolution Rate (JER) represents the longer-term evolutionary objective of improving judgment through outcome-based learning. This note constitutes the initial public disclosure of the DIArc architecture and establishes its theoretical baseline for subsequent research and branch concepts.

Lucas Xiaochun Xu · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 27, 2026

Looking beyond natural sequences

A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.