An implementation-grounded Open Access Platform (OAP) blueprint and audit protocol for visual quality control as a service that supports semantic traceability, controlled promotion and rollback, human accountability and Industry 5.0-aligned industrial AI governance without overstating the completed evidence.
Abstract
Visual quality control increasingly relies on machine learning (ML), but reliable production adoption requires a governed data-model-service lifecycle rather than an isolated detector. This article presents an implementation-grounded Open Access Platform (OAP) blueprint and audit protocol for visual quality control as a service. The contribution is not a new detector backbone. It is a reproducible governance pattern that connects ontology-based data validation, Neo4j knowledge-graph traceability, Eclipse Arrowhead service discovery, human-in-the-loop annotation, dataset and model registries, operational quality gates, and controlled model adaptation. The platform context is supported by implemented OAP tools for battery carbon-footprint analysis and production planning, while the visual inspection modules are reported at the notebook level. The benchmark protocol uses leakage-safe splits and OK samples with empty label files, separates the MVTec AD augmentation corpus from the unlearning stress-test corpus, and requires FP-on-OK gating with a retrained post-removal reference. The resulting architecture supports semantic traceability, controlled promotion and rollback, human accountability and Industry 5.0-aligned industrial AI governance without overstating the completed evidence. Compared with existing MLOps architectures, OAPs add inspection-specific semantic enforcement, knowledge-graph lineage, and governed adaptation.
The five-layer approach to using this information asset gives practitioners and researchers a reference architecture for designing, evaluating, and governing enterprise knowledge graph deployments built on proprietary organizational data.
AI systems depend on human judgment, yet many annotation workflows are either designed for data-science specialists or managed through external commercial platforms. The first approach may demand more technical skills than relevant stakeholders possess. The second can require organizations to transfer data, expertise,...
Philippine Waisvisz· Communications of the IIMA· 0 citations
Organisations rely on ISO/IEC 27001 to structure information security management, yet controls and Privacy by Design guidance are typically documented in heterogeneous, unstructured forms that impede cross-framework comparability. Existing taxonomies and ontologies are predominantly manual, static, and do not support a...
Mevre Tunca, Ann-Jacqueline Kaldjob, Laura Porbadnik et al.· International Symposium on N...· 0 citations
Gold-free, rule-based verification thus locates where MLLM reliability holds, giving human–AI collaboration quantified, disclosed residual risk rather than an implied guarantee, and recommends the extended level where date fidelity is regulatory-critical.
A practical framework for organizations introducing API performance testing from scratch and a knowledge management framing that treats performance testing outputs as reusable organizational assets are contributed.
Inga Zilinskiene· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
knowFeat, a knowledge-guided feature engineering framework that organizes domain knowledge into five types -- schema metadata, regulatory indicators, detection rules, expert opinions, and court document evidence -- and injects them as structured context into an LLM agent and maintains competitive detection performance...
Chengsong You, Wangyue Li, Wei-Qiao Que et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.