Does Germline BRCA1/2 Status Modify the Effect of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab on Pathological Complete Response in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment-Biomarker Interactions
Aug 2026· Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research· Vol 10, pp. 2896-2908· 0 citations· 52 references
TL;DR
The direction of effect is compatible with greater relative pembrolizumab-associated pCR improvement among carriers, but the evidence does not establish a predictive interaction.
Abstract
Background: Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants are associated with chemotherapy response, but higher response among pembrolizumab-treated carriers does not establish a treatment-predictive interaction.
Objective: To determine whether germline BRCA1/2 status modifies the effect of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab on pathological complete response in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer, estimated as a within-study treatment-by-biomarker interaction on the ratio-of-odds-ratios scale.
Methods: Accessible bibliographic, registry, and citation sources were searched from inception through the final accessible-source update for comparative cohorts of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone reporting pathological complete response (pCR) by germline BRCA1/2 status. One author approved screening, extraction, ROBINS-I, and ICEMAN judgements. Treatment-by-biomarker interactions were expressed as ratios of odds ratios (RORs) and pooled by restricted-maximum-likelihood random effects with Hartung-Knapp inference.
Results: Three retrospective cohorts (655 participants) were included; two (415 participants) provided complete interaction cells. Study RORs were 3.65 (95% CI 0.52-25.62) and 2.76 (0.39-19.39). The pooled ROR was 3.17 (0.54-18.51; p=0.076), with tau-squared=0 and I-squared=0%. The third cohort remained qualitative because noncarrier cells were irreconcilable. Risk of bias was serious, interaction credibility was low, and certainty was very low.
Conclusion: The direction of effect is compatible with greater relative pembrolizumab-associated pCR improvement among carriers, but the evidence does not establish a predictive interaction. Prospective adjusted interaction analyses are required.
BACKGROUND
Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA-PV) are associated with chemosensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but whether higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates translate into improved long-term outcomes remains uncertain. We assessed associations of gBRCA-PV status with pCR, recurre...
Paulina Gebhart, F. Heinzl, Chiara Kahl et al.· Breast Cancer· 0 citations
Background Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy is standard of care for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Real-world data remain limited outside trial populations, particularly in the Middle East, and hormone receptor (HR)-low tumors (ER/PR 1–10%) are undercharacterised in this setting. Me...
B. Sharaf, T. Al-Batsh, Suhaib Khater et al.· Breast Cancer· 0 citations
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with limited targeted treatment options. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated pathological complete response (pCR) outcomes associated with nab-paclitaxel-containing neoadjuvant regimens incorporating platinum chemothe...
R. A. Salama, M. El-Tanani, S. A. Rabbani et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The randomised phase III OlympiA trial (NCT02032823) compared 1 year of adjuvant olaparib (oral poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] inhibitor) to placebo in 1,836 patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCApv) germline variants and high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2...
J. Garber, D. Cameron, C. Campbell et al.· Annals of Oncology· 1 citation
Background: Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are established contributors to hereditary breast cancer, yet their separate prognostic effects in non-metastatic disease remain uncertain because they are frequently analyzed as a single group. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 360 patients with stage I–I...
İ. Bayrakçı, R. Coşar, N. Sut et al.· Cancers· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.