Skip to content

AI risk management for insurers

Sep 2026 · Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions · 0 citations

TL;DR

It is argued that insurers which proactively integrate AI governance into core ERM processes, supported by cross-functional collaboration between risk, compliance, data protection, and technology teams, will be best positioned to realise AI’s benefits while maintaining consumer trust, regulatory compliance, and resilience.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping the UK insurance sector, offering significant opportunities for efficiency, innovation, and improved customer outcomes. At the same time, AI introduces complex and fast-moving risks relating to model opacity, bias, data protection, consumer fairness, operational resilience, and third party dependency. This paper argues that AI does not constitute a wholly new category of risk for insurers; rather, it acts as a powerful amplifier of existing enterprise risks, increasing their speed, scale, connectedness, and potential impact. Drawing on regulatory guidance, industry practice, and emerging AI risk frameworks, the paper examines divergent stakeholder perspectives on AI adoption, including those of insurers, regulators, and consumers. It highlights a growing consensus that organisations must act now to integrate AI risk considerations into established enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks, rather than relying on parallel or siloed AI governance structures. The paper proposes a principles-based practical approach for embedding AI risk within existing taxonomies, registers, and control environments, with particular emphasis on identifying where AI amplified prudential, conduct, data protection, resilience, reputational, and third party risks. Particular attention is given to the role of data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) as a critical governance mechanism for identifying and managing AI-amplified risks, aligned with UK regulatory expectations and international developments such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) and the forthcoming European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act). The paper concludes that insurers which proactively integrate AI governance into core ERM processes, supported by cross-functional collaboration between risk, compliance, data protection, and technology teams, will be best positioned to realise AI’s benefits while maintaining consumer trust, regulatory compliance, and resilience. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Insurance: Industry Transformation, Customer Benefits, and Emerging Risks

Artificial intelligence (AI), and generative AI in particular, is being adopted across the insurance industry at the same time that customers are migrating to digital channels and demanding greater personalization. The purpose of this review is to examine how AI is reshaping insurance, why it can benefit customers, and...

Goncha Muradli · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Governing data risks in the age of AI

This paper proposes a practical, audit-ready approach to governing data risks in the AI era, and introduces the concept of critical data elements (CDEs): data elements whose inaccuracy, unavailability, or misuse can produce material regulatory, financial, or customer-facing impact.

Xin-Fa Tu · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Risks Associated with the Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being adopted across healthcare, finance, manufacturing, cybersecurity, education, and other sectors because of its ability to support prediction, automation, pattern recognition, and decision-making. However, the growing use of AI also introduces technical, security, econom...

Sujal Mutgekar, Sanika More Sanika, Vipul Zope et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

From Model Risk Management to AI Assurance: Integrating AI Risk Management, Independent Validation, and AI Auditing for Generative and Agentic AI

Generative and agentic artificial intelligence challenge assumptions embedded in traditional model risk management (MRM), including stable system boundaries, direct observability, controllable change, and access to model-development evidence. Yet the enduring purposes of MRM—inventory, materiality assessment, independe...

Timothy Godlove, John Buchanan · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Striking the balance between innovation and risk: A practical governance framework for AI adoption in financial services

This paper explores how AI can be deployed as a pre-review and triage mechanism — supporting global consistency, scalability, and time-to-market — while preserving human judgment, accountability, and regulatory defensibility.

Johanna Anders · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Agentic AI in Finance: Emerging Risks and the Regulatory Gap

Financial institutions are deploying AI agents that plan and execute multistep workflows across research, portfolio rebalancing, trading, and client service. Fully autonomous use remains rare, creating a window in which governance can precede scale. This article gives portfolio managers, risk officers, boards, and supe...

Vincent Grégoire · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.