Skip to content
Open access

Objetividad e injusticia epistémica

Aug 2026 · Revista de filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica · Vol 65 · 0 citations · 35 references

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between objectivity and epistemic injustice. It aims to question the guiding principles of scientific objectivity through criteria of epistemic justice, seeking to identify whether these principles create conflicts for objectivity. To this end, discourse analysis has been employed, focusing primarily on the construction of the notion of objectivity and the conditions of epistemic injustice established by Miranda Fricker. The text presents an historical approach to the conceptualization of objectivity, followed by an introduction to the characteristics of epistemic injustice, contrasting these with cases and critiques developed within various non-classical epistemic perspectives. The article argues for the existence of a structural epistemic bias that implies conditions under which epistemic injustice is not only possible or occasional but also appears as a habitual manifestation in knowledge production processes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Vicious Metaphysics?

Recent developments in the debate on epistemic injustice have expanded the original concept to include abstracta as epistemically unjust. Drawing on these arguments, we propose to distinguish between inherent conceptional epistemic injustice and contingent conception-mediated epistemic injustice. Applying this distinct...

Anke Jahn, Thor Hennelund Nielsen · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Justificatory Injustice: Epistemic Injustice in the Availability of Reasons

Abstract Most people have a need to regard their significant life choices as justified. More than that, they want to be able to give acceptable justificatory reasons to the people in their social milieu. In this paper, I argue that structural disadvantage can lock people into a situation in which they struggle to appea...

Gloria Mähringer · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

From impertinence to impostorism. An analysis of gaslighting as positional injustice

This article proposes a critical reading of gaslighting and impostorism as relational effects of what will be termed positional injustice: a form of harm that simultaneously undermines a subject’s epistemic and affective self-trust by systematically placing them in a position of testimonial invalidation. Drawing on...

M. Christiansen · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Interpreting Philosophical Preconceptions

This paper examines the interpretation of philosophical preconceptions as a central activity of teaching philosophy. Complementing approaches that focus primarily on learners’ preconceptions as starting points of inquiry, it develops an account of the epistemic structure of the teacher’s interpretive activity. Drawing...

N. Höppner · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

EPISTEMIC INJUSTICE AND THE POLITICS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE IN BONNIE GARMUS'S LESSONS IN CHEMISTRY

This article examines epistemic injustice and the politics of scientific knowledge in Bonnie Garmus’s novel Lessons in Chemistry. The study explores how gender inequality, institutional exclusion, and social authority influence the production and recognition of scientific knowledge in the fictional world of the 1950s a...

Zarinabonu Toyirjonova · 0 citations
Book 2018

Partial Values

When, if ever, is it permissible to afford special consideration to friends and family? How can we strive to be objective in our thinking, and is this always a feasible or appropriate aim? This book examines the categories of impartiality and objectivity by showing how they frame certain debates in epistemology, moral...

DeLapp Kevin · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.