How Well Do Generative Music Models Follow Emotion Conditioning?
TL;DR
It is found that valence is preserved more reliably than arousal and that emotion-following varies substantially across genres, underscore the importance of evaluating affective controllability directly rather than relying solely on general quality or prompt-relevance metrics.
Abstract
Recent generative music models offer increasingly fine-grained control through text and audio conditioning, yet how faithfully they follow intended emotional cues remains an open question. We address this gap with a unified evaluation pipeline for emotion-following in generated music. Using all 1000 tracks in GTZAN, we extract semantic audio descriptions with DashengLM, an audio captioning model, and estimate source-track valence and arousal with Music2Emotion, a music emotion recognition model. We construct affect-aware text prompts by combining descriptions with top-ranked emotion tags and generate 30-second outputs with three systems, Stable Audio Open, MusicGen, and InspireMusic, evaluating both text- and audio-conditioned generation. To measure emotion-following, we compute valence and arousal on generated audio and compare them with the source tracks using absolute error and Euclidean distance in valence-arousal space. Text-conditioned generation consistently outperforms audio conditioning, with MusicGen (text) and InspireMusic (text) achieving the best performance, while audio-conditioned variants prove less stable. We further find that valence is preserved more reliably than arousal and that emotion-following varies substantially across genres. These findings underscore the importance of evaluating affective controllability directly rather than relying solely on general quality or prompt-relevance metrics.