Sep 2026· World Journal of English Language· 0 citations
Abstract
The present study explores the role of cognitive linguistics in English-Arabic translation, with particular attention to conceptual metaphor theory, frame semantics, and embodied cognition as key cognitive mechanisms underlying the processes of meaning construction and reconstruction. It critically challenges traditional translation paradigms based on formal or dynamic equivalence, positing that translation is not a process of direct linguistic substitution. Instead, it is a cognitively driven and culturally embedded act of conceptual negotiation. Within this conceptual framework, meaning is not a fixed or self-contained entity transferred between languages; rather, it is a dynamic construct continually shaped and reshaped by culturally situated cognitive frameworks and embodied experiential patterns. The study adopts a qualitative interpretive methodology, drawing on a purposive selection of linguistic data across a range of genres, including everyday expressions. The analysis reveals systematic divergences between English and Arabic in the conceptualization of abstract domains such as emotion, time, and social relations. English tends to foreground notions of linearity, autonomy, and instrumental rationality, whereas Arabic discourse more frequently emphasizes relational orientations, moral embeddedness, and experiential intensity. These divergences manifest in distinct metaphorical mappings and frame structuring, which often resist literal translation and necessitate adaptive processes of conceptual reconfiguration. The findings further demonstrate that both traditional equivalence-based paradigms and contemporary machine translation systems are limited in accounting for culturally and cognitively complex meaning. While technological tools may enhance lexical consistency and processing efficiency, they remain fundamentally insufficient for apprehending deeper conceptual and metaphorical dimensions of language. The study concludes that cognitively informed translation constitutes a more comprehensive and explanatory framework for understanding translation phenomena, as it systematically integrates the cognitive, linguistic, and cultural dimensions of meaning. Accordingly, it advocates for a paradigmatic shift toward cognitively grounded translation approaches that strengthen both theoretical understanding and practical effectiveness in English-Arabic translation contexts.
Translation between Arabic and English is often introduced through visible contrasts in script, sound, word order, and morphology. Those contrasts matter, but they do not fully explain why an apparently accurate translation may still alter agency, weaken a metaphor, change the degree of certainty, or flatten the rhythm...
Elsayed Mohammed Aly Misfir bin Mahmas Al-Dosari· Natural Resources for Human...· 0 citations
Within the framework of the modern cognitive and discursive paradigm of linguistic knowledge, this article investigates the mental and pragmatic mechanisms underlying the functioning of gerundial constructions in the position of verbal complementation. Drawing on data from representative synchronous English corpora (Br...
O. P. Ryabko· Current Issues in Philology...· 0 citations
Meaning constitutes the foundation of language, shaping both its structure and interpretation.
Among its various dimensions, conversational meaning is central, arising not solely from lexical
content but from the interaction of speaker intention, context, and pragmatic function. Unlike literal
meaning, which is relativ...
S. Lenka· Applicable Nonlinear Analysi...· 0 citations
The article aims to describe the cognitive and linguistic mechanisms
of meaning construction that underlie manipulative impact in media discourse
and to demonstrate how cross-domain conceptual projections between TRUTH
and LIE conceptual domains generate blend zones that enable covert influence on
the addressee. The st...
Vera Zabotkina, E. Pozdnyakova· RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. "Literar...· 0 citations
The inner thoughts of characters in English literary works are embedded in textual details such as dialogues, actions and environmental descriptions. Traditional literary analysis mostly relies on superficial plotlines and subjective aesthetic judgments, which easily leads to subjectively biased interpretations and vag...
Kun He, T.-T. Feng, J. Pan· Advanced Electromagnetics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.