The author focuses on certain aspects of Classical Armenian transliteration, basing his study on fifth-century Armenian root words borrowed from the Latin, Greek, Persian, Hebrew and Assyrian languages.
He argues that Classical Armenian established a very deep and broad transliteration tradition, setting a precedent from the first time those borrowed words were written in Armenian letters.
The author notes that the some 1400 Persian root words imported to Classical Armenian all came through the centuries-old daily communication that existed between the two nations. This is why the transliteration of these words does not follow a strict and well-established set of rules. The borrowed Assyrian words (around 210) were also imported through centuries-old daily communication that existed between the Assyrians and the Armenians. However, these words by and large follow a set of transliteration rules due to the large number of clerics who used to serve in Armenia throughout the 4th and early 5th century, as well as due to the large number of young Armenian students who went to Assyria to learn the language and translate the Bible from Syriac.
Unlike these two cases, all the 900 root words imported from the Greek language came through translating Greek scriptures into Armenian, as Armenians did not have direct daily contact with the Greeks. The author notes that, contrary to expectations, Greek to Armenian transliteration is not consistent.
The author highlights the proper name David, which is transliterated into Armenian as Davith, and argues that the Ethiopian language writes this proper name like the Armenians. Furthermore, he discerns a set of patterns in certain root words borrowed from Greek and hypothesizes that Classical Armenian had established a tradition for borrowed words which had double consonants. The author proves as well that 5th century Classical Armenian had established a firm rule regarding the transliteration of elongated vowels (which Armenian lacks) in Assyrian, Greek and Persian, by adding semi-sounds to the corresponding Armenian vowel.
The problem of transliteration of foreign proper names is more than painful for Armenians. Unlike ancient times, when Armenian was united, today a foreign word is transliterated into Armenian in three or four ways, due to the lack of canonized laws. The study is the first section of a series of articles examining the p...
The term "Haykabanutyun" often comes across in scientific literature and fiction. The concept of "Haykabanutyun," however, hasn't been defined so far and we cannot explain what did Haykabanutyun/Haykaban specifically mean.
The author tackles this concern in this article, based on diverse dictionaries and other sources....
This article is one of a series that deals with the transliteration of foreign proper names into Armenian (the way to transcribe foreign names in Armenian characters).
The first part of the series was devoted to the Middle Eastern languages (Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Azerbaijani); see Armen Michaelian, «The Principl...
The study focuses on diverse sorts of lexical borrowings of the Armenian language (particularly Western Armenian) from Turkish.
The author groups these borrowings into two categories: a) word borrowings, and b) grammatic-syntactic borrowings.
Regarding the word borrowings, the author considers several different sorts o...
Unlike some Indo-European languages like Italian, French, Spanish and English, the Armenian language shifted from Grabar to contemporary Armenian without eliminating Grabar's declination system, which is still maintained almost intact. This is why Armenian syntax pays due attention to rection, that is, the linking of v...
The paper examines the names of plants and fruits in the dialect of Kesab. The origins of most of these nouns are native Armenian words which have been imported to the dialect with historical and partial semantic changes. On rare occasions names which originate from Arabic or Turkish have replaced the Armenian names. A...