Sep 2026· Journal of Education and Learning· Vol 15, pp. 581· 0 citations
TL;DR
The study reveals that GenAI exceeds functional utility by establishing a motivational climate, providing emotional support, maintaining a non-judgmental zone, and co-constructing pedagogical knowledge.
Abstract
The implementations of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education have been designed based on instrumentalist paradigms, which positions the technology as an administrative support or an instructional tutor. However, this utilitarian purpose overlooks the ontological potential of GenAI to act as a social agent in the context of collaborative learning. This study, adopting a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach, proposes a substantive theory regarding the integration of GenAI as a socio-digital peer learner to drive curriculum transformation in teacher education. The inquiry draws upon a heterogeneous dataset comprising repeated interviews with a global group of pedagogical and technical experts, triangulated with synthetic data derived from recursive dialogues with advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) and industry-based field observations. The study reveals that GenAI exceeds functional utility by establishing a motivational climate, providing emotional support, maintaining a non-judgmental zone, and co-constructing pedagogical knowledge. Consequently, the resulting theory advocates for a paradigm shift from technology-as-a-tool to technology-as-a-social-collaborator, proposing a transformative framework where future educators develop dialogic agency alongside their non-human peers.
The rapid integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into higher education has sparked a search for order amid significant upheaval. Current academic discourse often relies on "hasty," unreflective role metaphors – modeling GenAI as a "learning partner" or "corrector" – to make the fundamental uncertaint...
J. Hafer, Ulrike Schroer· Ubiquity Proceedings· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming pedagogical practices in higher education by generating explanations, feedback, simulations, learning resources, and dialogic prompts. Existing AI frameworks in education predominantly conceptualize AI through functional roles, such as tutoring, assessm...
Sharmila Rani Moganadas, Freddy Marín-González, Shwu Huey Nun et al.· Frontiers in Education· 1 citation
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has entered education faster than the theoretical and methodological frameworks used to evaluate it. This critical integrative review asks a more consequential question than whether GenAI ‘works’: under what pedagogical conditions can it augment learning without displacing lea...
A. Haro-Sarango· Multidisciplinary Latin Amer...· 0 citations
Learner autonomy has long been recognized as a vital component in English as a Second Language pedagogy. However, its implementation remains limited in Sri Lanka, where English language proficiency continues to pose a significant challenge across diverse social strata. In this context, promoting autonomous learning pra...
S. Batuwatta· Vidyodaya Journal of Humanit...· 0 citations
How innovation discourse in classrooms is simultaneously emancipatory and constraining is revealed, offering practitioners, policymakers, and educational technologists a nuanced understanding of the sociolinguistic dynamics underpinning twenty-first-century learning.
I. Nkopuruk· WORLD JOURNAL OF INNOVATION...· 0 citations
Despite the rapid adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), empirical studies comparing educational task performance with and without its assistance remain scarce. This study addresses this gap by examining how in-service teachers draft authentic Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) time-management scenarios wit...
Dafna Avidov, Ran Tel-Nir, Orit Ezra et al.· Ubiquity Proceedings· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.