2026· Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences· Vol 4, pp. 1-12· 0 citations
TL;DR
Among the six types of cohesion-based errors identified, the missing-word error and the non-translated word error were taken into account with the highest and the lowest impact upon the participants' intelligibility of the machine translated texts.
Abstract
Basically, nowadays, such translation-based computer technologies as machine translation systems are employed so as to increase the speed and achieve far higher quality in translation due to the high volume of translation projects and limited time periods. The main goal of this research is to identify the cohesion- based errors committed in machine translation, to evaluate their impact upon the chains of the cohesive devices and also upon the intelligibility of machine translated outputs. In this research, the data was collected from three different machine translation systems, followed by 30 master students of TEFL as the participants in this research were employed in order to back translate a selected quantity of machine translated texts so as to evaluate the quality and the level of intelligibility. Based on the obtained results, it was determined that Google machine translation system assigned the first position due to its better quality and the less proportion of cohesion-based errors committed. On the other hand, Abadis, with a relatively small distinction compared to Google's performance in terms of the quality and the statistic of committed errors, allocated the second position, which confirmed its far better performance than Bing. In addition, regarding the cohesion-based errors affecting the intelligibility of the machine translated texts, it could be argued that among the six types of cohesion-based errors identified, the missing-word error and the non-translated word error were taken into account with the highest and the lowest impact upon the participants' intelligibility of the machine translated texts.
This study investigates stylistic features in English–Italian machine translation by comparing the outputs of Google Translate and ChatGPT-5.2, and shows that the two systems seem to adopt similar translation solutions, but they differ in the quantitative distribution of translation equivalents.
Natália Resende, Sheila Castilho, Maria Clara Menezes et al.· 0 citations
The study concludes that terminological consistency should be considered as a separate dimension of translation quality and emphasizes the importance of terminology control and human post-editing in AI-assisted political translation.
Osama Bala· (Faculty of Arts Journal) مج...· 0 citations
Classification represents many types of translation; each of them is transformed due to external and internal factors, for example, due to the machine and automated translation development. There is also a variety of translation definitions, however they all include a specialist, who uses two or more language systems,...
Daria Vasileva· Vestnik of Saint Petersburg...· 0 citations
The article examines the quality of neural machine translation of promotional texts in the context of digitalization and the active integration of artificial intelligence into multilingual communication. The authors state that source texts should be deliberately optimized for machine translation in order to enhance the...
V. Mityagina, A. Novozhilova· Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosud...· 0 citations
This article examines the development of machine translation, its technological evolution, and its role in modern multilingual communication. Particular attention is given to translation accuracy, contextual adequacy, communicative equivalence, and the challenges of representing domain-specific and culturally condition...
Iroda Utayeva· QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.