Sep 2026· Global Intelligent Industry Conference· Vol 14322, pp. 143223B - 143223B-13· 0 citations· 36 references
Engineering
Abstract
In edge computing scenarios such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) patrol and vehicular perception, moving object extraction is highly susceptible to failure under low-light, inclement weather, and low-framerate conditions because of constrained sensor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and environmental interference. Existing deep learning models also struggle to satisfy the strict computational limits of edge payloads. To address these issues, this paper proposes a lightweight, purely CPU-driven framework that integrates background subtraction and video denoising. In the foreground perception stage, three-dimensional uncertainty metrics—capturing spatial texture, temporal motion, and illumination variation—are extracted online. An interpretable sensitivity matrix dynamically fuses multiple complementary detectors, suppressing false alarms triggered by low-light noise and dynamic backgrounds. In the video restoration stage, the binary mask generated from perception serves as a semantic prior: aggressive temporal-averaging denoising is applied to static background regions, while guided filtering is used for moving objects to preserve edge details, creating a mutual reinforcement loop in which detection guides denoising and cleaner frames facilitate robust perception. Evaluations on public benchmarks covering extreme low-light and adverse weather conditions show that the proposed method improves the detection F1 score by over 175% compared with traditional baselines in low-framerate scenarios and outperforms all evaluated classical algorithms in night scenes. It also achieves an overall denoising gain of 2.08 dB. Operating without GPU acceleration or offline training, the system maintains a single-frame latency of approximately 45 ms, making it suitable for real-time perception on resource-constrained edge platforms.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.