Skip to content
#edge computing Conference

Uncertainty-aware background subtraction and semantic-guided denoising for adverse environments

Sep 2026 · Global Intelligent Industry Conference · Vol 14322, pp. 143223B - 143223B-13 · 0 citations · 36 references
Engineering

Abstract

In edge computing scenarios such as unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) patrol and vehicular perception, moving object extraction is highly susceptible to failure under low-light, inclement weather, and low-framerate conditions because of constrained sensor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and environmental interference. Existing deep learning models also struggle to satisfy the strict computational limits of edge payloads. To address these issues, this paper proposes a lightweight, purely CPU-driven framework that integrates background subtraction and video denoising. In the foreground perception stage, three-dimensional uncertainty metrics—capturing spatial texture, temporal motion, and illumination variation—are extracted online. An interpretable sensitivity matrix dynamically fuses multiple complementary detectors, suppressing false alarms triggered by low-light noise and dynamic backgrounds. In the video restoration stage, the binary mask generated from perception serves as a semantic prior: aggressive temporal-averaging denoising is applied to static background regions, while guided filtering is used for moving objects to preserve edge details, creating a mutual reinforcement loop in which detection guides denoising and cleaner frames facilitate robust perception. Evaluations on public benchmarks covering extreme low-light and adverse weather conditions show that the proposed method improves the detection F1 score by over 175% compared with traditional baselines in low-framerate scenarios and outperforms all evaluated classical algorithms in night scenes. It also achieves an overall denoising gain of 2.08 dB. Operating without GPU acceleration or offline training, the system maintains a single-frame latency of approximately 45 ms, making it suitable for real-time perception on resource-constrained edge platforms.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.