Skip to content
Open access

Algorithmic trading risks and their classification

Aug 2026 · Entrepreneur's Guide · Vol 19, pp. 30-37 · 0 citations · 7 references

TL;DR

It is argued that traditional classifications (market, credit, operational risks) fail to capture key features of modern trading algorithms: ultra–high speed (microsecond range), complexity of neural network decision interpretation, and the potential of single errors to trigger systemic failures.

Abstract

The article analyzes the specific nature of risks arising in the context of algorithmic trading on the stock market. It is argued that traditional classifications (market, credit, operational risks) fail to capture key features of modern trading algorithms: ultra–high speed (microsecond range), complexity of neural network decision interpretation, and the potential of single errors to trigger systemic failures. A new risk classification is proposed based on eight criteria: source of origin, impact level, predictability degree, time horizon, legal personality nature, controllability, technological factor type, and regulatory sensitivity. This approach enables both threat systematization and identification of specific management measures – from algorithm auditing to regulatory reforms. The destabilizing factors affecting the stock market were also listed. They play an increasing role as algorithmic trading develops, including various kinds of failures, both technical and human–related, liquidity problems at unstable markets, regulatory aspects of stock market regulation, etc. Attention was paid to the consideration of the interaction of algorithms with each other and the effects that may occur as a result of such interaction. We are talking about so–called flash crashes, when a malfunction of one algorithm can lead to a cascading failure of other algorithms, which causes an unpredictable effect on the market as a whole. Even a failure in one particular market can lead to disruptions in global markets as a whole, given the interdependence and global analysis of data by algorithms when making trading decisions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Quantitative Trading: Application Pipeline, Prospects, and Risk Governance

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a significant force in the field of quantitative trading because it extends traditional rule-based systems to areas such as adaptive prediction, dynamic configuration and automated execution. At the same time, the widespread adoption of machine learning, reinforcement learning, a...

Zi-Chong Long · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Algorithmic Trading and its Effect on Market Efficiency

It is concluded that investing in algorithmic trading platforms is highly viable, enhancing price discovery, market liquidity, and trading cost efficiency, far exceeding the 10% discount hurdle rate.

Suru Prem Sai, Pavani Mudem, T. Meghana · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Algorithmic Finance: A Literature Review on the Usage and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Management

The synthesis demonstrates that while AI applications substantially enhance forecasting accuracy, operational speed, and risk mitigation efficiency, they concurrently introduce critical systemic concerns, including black-box opacity, algorithmic market manipulation risks, data privacy vulnerabilities, and model risk.

T. Partha · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Financial Risk Management Using Artificial Intelligence: Applications, Innovations, and Challenges

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) has fundamentally re-engineered the paradigm of financial risk management. Modern financial institutions face unprecedented complexities characterized by high-frequency transactions, massive interconnected data structures, and rapidly evolving fr...

Mohit Singhal · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Algorithmic Symmetry in Securities Markets: Toward a Legal Duty to Manage Common-Reliance Risk in AI Models

This study examines whether securities regulation should move beyond firm-level artificial-intelligence governance and recognise a legal duty to manage common-reliance risk. The study defines algorithmic symmetry as material reliance by multiple market participants on the same or materially similar artificial-intellige...

A. Alasmari · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

How AI has revolutionised stock markets

It is found that stock markets had become more efficient by being data-driven due to the advent of AI, with proper regulation, ethical AI practices and human oversight to maximize the benefits and minimize pitfalls on certain risks.

Aadi Chandra · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.