Skip to content
Review Open access

Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Managing Bias, Privacy, Explainability, Safety, and Clinical Accountability in Practice

Aug 2026 · American Journal of Technology Advancement · Vol 3, pp. 89-103 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Evidence on trusted AI applications in oncology is assessed and current challenges and solutions in fairness, data privacy, interpretability, safety, validation, and clinical governance are discussed to discuss current challenges and solutions in fairness.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has quickly gained traction in oncology, assisting with cancer diagnosis, prognosis prediction, treatment selection, and precision medicine. Numerous concerns, such as bias, privacy, explainability, safety, and clinical accountability, go against the rapid implementation of AI in clinical settings. To ensure trustworthiness of AI systems, safe, equitable, and patient-centered cancer care must be developed. This systematic review will assess evidence on trusted AI applications in oncology and discuss current challenges and solutions in fairness, data privacy, interpretability, safety, validation, and clinical governance. We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Embase, following PRISMA guidelines. We included only publications that evaluated key AI applications in oncology and addressed at least one key domain of trustworthy AI. We categorized all qualitative data by study characteristics, AI technique, clinical application, and trust-related aspects. The reviewed literature showed a wide range of diagnostic, histological, prognosis, response, and precision oncology applications of AI across various studies. Some studies reported positive clinical performance with deep learning and machine learning models; however, privacy concerns, limited external validation, a lack of clear accountability frameworks, limited model explainability, and concerns about dataset bias were commonly reported. Strategies for successful, trustworthy AI deployment included privacy-preserving approaches, fairness assessment, explainable AI methods, and robust clinical validation. AI is a significant player in oncology, but it must be implemented appropriately and ethically, with the right clinical protocols in place. A key focus of future research is developing clear, secure, fair, and clinically proven AI systems to support the safe and equitable use of AI in cancer care.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Mar 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Practice: Validation, Fairness, and Regulatory Challenges: A Systematic Review

AI demonstrates strong potential to improve the effectiveness, safety, and quality of healthcare, however, broader clinical adoption remains constrained by regulatory requirements, interpretability gaps, data quality issues, and workflow integration challenges, underscoring the need for stronger validation practices an...

Ghulam Hussain Noori, Shaista Bibi, Seung Won Lee · 0 citations
#explainable ai Open access Oct 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: diagnostic, therapeutic and ethical impact

AI offers considerable potential to reduce costs, increase diagnostic accuracy, personalize care and expand access to quality services, provided its deployment overcomes technical, ethical and regulatory barriers through proactive, adaptive and patient-centered governance.

Laura Beatriz Fernández Feitó, Mariam Alejandra González González, Andy Alonso Pazos et al. · 0 citations
#explainable ai Sep 2026

Trust and the reliability of AI algorithms for clinical decision-making support in medicine: the MIRACLE case study

This paper distinguishes technical reliability from trust in AI-supported clinical decision-making, arguing that the two belong to distinct registers that current debates tend to elide and proposes replacing the expression "trustworthy AI" with "technically reliable AI," a distinction that relocates the conditions of t...

Miranda Boldrini, Damien Lacroux, Marie-Sophie von Braun et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Governing artificial intelligence in cancer care: Perspectives and recommendations from patient organizations and the MULTIR consortium.

BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve cancer care. Its implementation must align with patients' needs, values, and lived experiences. This study aimed to explore perspectives from patient advocates representing patient organizations, including individuals with experience of melanoma, blad...

I. Budin-Ljøsne, Alessandro Boni, L. Boussemart et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Risk Management in AI-Assisted Clinical Trials: Regulatory and Ethical Dimensions

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) models into clinical trials has accelerated significantly over the past decade, offering substantial potential to optimise patient recruitment, endpoint analysis, and pharmacovigilance. However, this integration also introduces a complex web of regulatory and ethical risk...

Filip Radonić · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

BEYOND ACCURACY: EXPLAINABILITY, WORKFLOW, AND GOVERNANCE IN THE CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

A review examines how free full-text PubMed literature describes the real-world implementation of AI in healthcare and identifies the technical, organizational, ethical, and social conditions that shape adoption.

Jagoda Pałubska, Oliwer Műller, Zuzanna Rafałowska et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.