Jul 2026· European Symposium on Security and Privacy· pp. 608-619· 0 citations· 30 references
Abstract
Federated Recommender Systems (FRSs) enable on-device personalization while preserving user privacy, yet the gradients shared during model training can still leak sensitive information. Local differential privacy (LDP) offers a formal defense, but classic mechanisms—randomized response and Laplace perturbation—inject substantial noise into the high-dimensional gradient vectors of latent-factor models, severely degrading recommendation accuracy. In this paper, we systematically evaluate these traditional LDP strategies in federated matrix factorization under both explicit (MovieLens 100K and 1M) and implicit (Steam, LastFM) feedback benchmarks. We then propose a novel directional noise mechanism based on the von Mises–Fisher distribution, which preserves gradient magnitudes while randomizing directions. Through extensive experiments across a wide range of privacy budgets, we show that our vMF mechanism consistently outperforms Laplace and binary randomized-response, recovering up to more than 100 % of the non-private utility at ε = 1 and delivering higher ranking accuracy under moderate privacy levels (ε ≤ 2). We further demonstrate that directional perturbation reduces variance and remains robust under partial client participation. Our findings highlight the importance of data geometry in privacy–utility trade-offs and provide practical guidance for deploying LDP in high-dimensional federated recommendation settings.
Differential privacy (DP) mechanisms have been widely adopted in federated learning (FL) to enhance model security. However, existing approaches predominantly employ uniform privacy budgets, neglecting personalized requirements arising from heterogeneous user privacy preferences. Such uniform privacy configurations typ...
Tianchi Liao, Xiaojun Deng, Lele Fu et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This work presents and evaluates a privacy-preserving recommendation framework that combines federated learning, differential privacy, cohort-level modeling, and privacy-aware intelligent agents, offering a scalable approach for next-generation AI-driven retail platforms.
Ranjeet K Jha, Venkata Suresh Gummadilli· 0 citations
i-FedLoRA provides privacy guarantees, improves model accuracy by up to 3.8%, and expedites training by 1.37-2.23×, and facilitates heterogeneous LoRA aggregation that selectively prioritizes high-confidence knowledge to filter DP-induced noise, thereby achieving robust knowledge transfer.
Nan Yan, Yuqing Li, Xiong Wang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
CoP is proposed, a coordinated perturbation mechanism designed to mitigate CIL in multidimensional data collection while preserving utility and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LDP mechanisms in reducing disclosure while preserving analytical accuracy.
Sandaru Jayawardana, Ming Ding, Kanchana Thilakarathna· Proceedings on Privacy Enhan...· 0 citations
Federated Learning (FL) avoids centralizing raw data, but server-side access to per-client updates still creates a significant privacy risk because gradients can leak sensitive information through inversion and related attacks. A common defense is client-level Differential Privacy (DP), which reduces attack fidelity by...
Clifford N. Jones, Md Nahid Hasan, S. Wagle et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed training while keeping data local, but exchanged model updates can leak information through membership inference attacks. Differential privacy mitigates this risk via noise injection; however, aggressive DP regimes with strong noise can destabilize large models. An SNR-guided...
Mohammed Hamza, I. B. Sofi, Kuljeet Kaur et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.