Skip to content

Integrating Perspectives on Discourse Annotation (DiscAnn)

· 0 citations · 144 references

TL;DR

The additional infer-encing involved in interpreting implicit relations compared to explicit relations is explored, which would be expected if agreement on implicit relations mainly suffers because annotators have less specific instructions for inferring the relation.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access 2025

Theoretical implications of automated discourse parsing in student writing

Comparing human annotations with outputs from generative large language models and examining their alignment with theoretical models of textuality show how computational approaches can shed light on linguistic theories and, vice versa, how linguistic theories can guide the application of computational resources.

A. Bienati, Mariachiara Pascucci, Jennifer-Carmen Frey et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Does Linguistic Structure Enrichment Enhance Coherence Assessment? Not With Current Architectures

This work investigates whether enriching text with syntactic and rhetorical information can improve incoherence prediction, and shows that plain texts achieved higher accuracy because the added information was structurally and syntactically incompatible with the language model's architecture.

V. Mazzotti, Luiz Pereira, Marina Bitencourt dos Santos et al. · 0 citations
#small language model Open access Sep 2026

Semantic labeling with fulfillers in multilingual contexts

This article introduces a novel approach to semantic labeling grounded in the fulfiller concept—a cognitive-semantic theory that highlights the role of absent but contextually inferred elements in meaning construction. We argue that the prevailing semantic labeling practices often neglect this essential aspect of m...

Kiran Pala, Vasudevan Nedumpozhimana, S. Shalu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.