The additional infer-encing involved in interpreting implicit relations compared to explicit relations is explored, which would be expected if agreement on implicit relations mainly suffers because annotators have less specific instructions for inferring the relation.
Comparing human annotations with outputs from generative large language models and examining their alignment with theoretical models of textuality show how computational approaches can shed light on linguistic theories and, vice versa, how linguistic theories can guide the application of computational resources.
A. Bienati, Mariachiara Pascucci, Jennifer-Carmen Frey et al.· Italian Journal of Computati...· 0 citations
This work investigates whether enriching text with syntactic and rhetorical information can improve incoherence prediction, and shows that plain texts achieved higher accuracy because the added information was structurally and syntactically incompatible with the language model's architecture.
V. Mazzotti, Luiz Pereira, Marina Bitencourt dos Santos et al.· 0 citations
It is suggested that LLMs can serve as auxiliary annotators for sensitive-language detection in historical materials, provided that human oversight and contextual interpretation remain central to annotation workflows.
Ya-Hui Zhao, Clemencia Siro, L. Hollink et al.· 0 citations
This article introduces a novel approach to semantic labeling grounded in the
fulfiller
concept—a cognitive-semantic theory that highlights the role of absent but contextually inferred elements in meaning construction. We argue that the prevailing semantic labeling practices often neglect this essential aspect of m...
Kiran Pala, Vasudevan Nedumpozhimana, S. Shalu et al.· Frontiers in Language Scienc...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.