An in-depth comparative analysis of Walton’s typology and Wagemans’ Periodic Table of Arguments is presented, and what are the two largest and most reliably annotated corpora of argument schemes in dialogical argumentation publicly available are produced.
An in-depth comparative analysis of Walton’s typology and Wagemans’ Periodic Table of Arguments is presented, and what are the two largest and most reliably annotated corpora of argument schemes in dialogical argumentation publicly available are produced.
Comparing human annotations with outputs from generative large language models and examining their alignment with theoretical models of textuality show how computational approaches can shed light on linguistic theories and, vice versa, how linguistic theories can guide the application of computational resources.
A. Bienati, Mariachiara Pascucci, Jennifer-Carmen Frey et al.· Italian Journal of Computati...· 0 citations
It is suggested that LLMs can serve as auxiliary annotators for sensitive-language detection in historical materials, provided that human oversight and contextual interpretation remain central to annotation workflows.
Ya-Hui Zhao, Clemencia Siro, L. Hollink et al.· 0 citations
The dataset contains the semantic annotations of clausal connectives from 24 languages, based on the original native-speaker elicitation data, and includes systematic evidence for the annotations in the form of context-sentence compatibility judgments, including negative evidence.
Anne Mucha, Ciyang Qing, W. Uegaki· International Conference on...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
