Skip to content
Conference

Engineering the Intangible: Value Elicitation, Prioritization, and Translation into Requirements

Aug 2026 · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference · pp. 580-584 · 0 citations · 27 references

Abstract

With the increasing use of LLMs, requirements engineering has changed significantly. Tasks that were previously conducted by or with stakeholders are now performed by or with LLMs. Consequently, requirements engineers, developers, and the like are increasingly relinquishing their autonomy. To counteract this trend, stakeholders' values should be given greater consideration. Human values have always been a focus in certain areas, such as healthcare and entertainment, but they are relevant to all areas. They shed light on people's basic needs and can reveal the core objectives underlying requirements. In addition to value-sensitive design and IEEE standards, other methods exist for integrating values into the software engineering process. However, few methods incorporate human values throughout the process, from elicitation to documentation. This work aims to implement a process that includes the necessary methods for eliciting, prioritizing, and translating human values into requirements in the context of software development. To achieve this goal, a series of empirical studies will be conducted through surveys, interviews, and workshops, in which the process or individual methods are applied. Similarly, the impact of integrating human values on software quality will be evaluated. The implementation and examination of such a process could help establish a framework to place greater emphasis on human values in software development without significant additional effort.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Aug 2026

Prioritizing Requirements Using Values and LLMs

LLMs are increasingly used for RE activities, including stakeholder tasks (e.g., requirements identification, negotiation, or prioritization). To avoid shifting the focus to LLMs and their requirements, human values should be given greater consideration. Project-specific values provide rationales for requirements, whic...

Elisa Schmid, Marc Herrmann, Michael Mircea et al. · 0 citations

USERS INVOLVEMENT IN REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING PROCESS

Well known requirements engineering methodologies are presented and the degree of the user involvement in the process of requirements negotiation is discussed and the system called TeamRooms, provides a persistent work space suitable for synchronous and asynchronous collaboration.

D. Herlea · 1 citation
Open access Oct 2026

COEUR: COhesion and Exhaustiveness of User Stories Representations

User Stories are key artifacts in Requirement and Software Engineering. Despite their wide adoption, their writing in industrial contexts tends to diverge from the principles initially stated in Agile methodologies. In this context, sets of metrics such as INVEST or QUS emerged to qualify these items. In this paper, we...

M. Ortega, Hassan Imhah, N. Mellouli et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.