Skip to content
Open access

Characterizing the Safety and Efficacy of Propofol in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

Aug 2026 · The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics · Vol 31 4, pp. 540-548 · 0 citations · 36 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Propofol was safely used to facilitate extubation and decreased baseline sedative exposure when used for sedation washout in a complex critically ill pediatric population and was tolerated by most patients at doses commonly exceeding guideline- recommended maximum rate and duration.

Abstract

Objectives

Propofol is used sparingly in pediatrics owing to the risk of propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS). The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of propofol in pediatrics and describe its effectiveness at facilitating extubation and decreasing concomitant sedation.

Methods

This retrospective, descriptive study evaluated critically ill children who received continuous propofol infusions for at least 12 consecutive hours while admitted to pediatric, congenital cardiac, or neonatal intensive care units. The primary outcome was PRIS incidence. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline in laboratory parameters, discontinuation due to adverse effects, change in sedative requirements following sedation washout, and successful extubation.

Results

From January 1, 2019, to November 1, 2023, a total of 100 children received 120 courses of propofol infusions. The median infusion rate was 106 mcg/kg/min (IQR, 68-149) and 27.5% of courses exceeded 48 hours in duration. No PRIS events were identified. Patients experienced a moderate, non-duration-dependent increase in triglycerides, with no impact on aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations; 11.7% of infusions were discontinued for adverse effects. No children self-extubated while on propofol when used for peri-extubation (N = 49). Opioid and benzodiazepine requirements were decreased by 17% and 26% from baseline, respectively, during a 24-hour period following sedation washout (N = 26).

Conclusions

Propofol was tolerated by most patients at doses commonly exceeding guideline-recommended maximum rate and duration. Propofol was safely used to facilitate extubation and decreased baseline sedative exposure when used for sedation washout in a complex critically ill pediatric population.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome:Diagnosis and Management

Early recognition of clinical manifestations, prompt discontinuation of propofol infusion, and timely initiation of supportive management are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with PRIS.

Hori Hariyanto, Carla Oktaviani Pandrya, Kevin Anderson Surya · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Age-related differences in extubation time following propofol-based target-controlled infusion in pediatric medium-duration surgery: A prospective cohort study.

In pediatric patients undergoing medium-duration surgery with propofol-based TCI anesthesia, extubation times were comparable across age groups despite higher propofol requirements in younger children, which should be interpreted with caution given the small sample sizes.

Issada Jindawatthana, P. Sriswasdi, Wiriya Maisat et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Impact of sedation with propofol and/or sufentanil on short-term outcomes in patients admitted to the intensive care unit: A retrospective study

The use of sufentanil, alone or combined with propofol, is associated with poorer short-term outcomes in ICU patients, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of sedation strategies in critically ill patients.

Luca Scarsella, Contrino Rita, El-Masri Dschamil et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Propofol for palliative sedation: A systematic review of clinical outcomes, safety, and ethical implications.

Propofol may be considered as a rescue option in selected refractory cases managed by experienced teams; however, given the low to very low certainty of available evidence, findings should be interpreted cautiously and supported by institutional protocols and further prospective research.

Luís Almeida-Jardim, P. Reis-Pina · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Impact of Propofol versus Etomidate on Hemodynamic Parameters During Induction in High-Risk Patients

Background: Induction of general anesthesia in high- ‘ risk patients is often associated with significant hemodynamic instability. Propofol and etomidate are commonly used induction agents, but their cardiovascular and endocrine effects differ. Aim: To compare propofol and etomidate with respect to hemodynamic stabilit...

Pankaj Kumar, Khushbu Rani, Muni Lal Gupta et al. · 0 citations
Clinical trial Open access Aug 2026

Ciprofol versus Propofol for Emergence Agitation and Recovery Quality in Pediatric Dental Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ciprofol was associated with significantly lower PAED scores, indicating reduced EA severity, along with faster emergence, improved recovery quality and higher parental satisfaction compared with propofol, suggesting that ciprofol may be an effective alternative to propofol in pediatric outpatient dental anesthesia.

Ya-Qiu Zhang, Long Wu, Zhen-Zhen Gao et al. · 2 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.